Unknown's avatar

About Friar Musings

Franciscan friar and Catholic priest at St. Francis of Assisi in Triangle, VA

St. Augustine of Hippo

Today is the Feast Day of St. Augustine of Hippo and perhaps it is good for a quick refresher of this person that so influenced Christianity. He was born in Thagaste, in Roman North Africa (present-day Algeria), growing up with his mother, Monica, was a devout Christian, while his father remained a pagan until late in life. His early life did not follow in his mother’s faith tradition, rather he pursued studies in rhetoric and philosophy, eventually teaching in Carthage, Rome, and Milan. His was the pursuit of truth which he sought in various philosophies and religious movements – none of which seemed to address his greater questions. In the interim, as was the tradition of the day, he was – shall we say – morally unsettled. Meanwhile his mother prayed for his conversion.

At the age of 31 he was moved by the preaching of St. Ambrose in Milan and by an experience of divine prompting while reading Scripture. It was in this period that he remarked: “Lord make me chaste, but not just yet” – a good indication of the on-going internal struggle. Soon enough Augustine was baptized and soon returned to North Africa founding a monastic community. He was later ordained a priest, becoming bishop of Hippo (North Africa) four years later, a position he held for 35 years.

Here are five pivotal moments in Augustine’s life and the impact of these moments that resonant even up to today:

Continue reading

Advice for the Guests

The gospel for the upcoming Sunday is taken from the Gospel of Luke describing an encounter with the Pharisees at a banquet.  In a wedding banquet setting it was expected that power and prestige would be placed closest to the head of the table (see Note on 14:7 below). This was probably more formal than most meals, but the words apply to any banquet.  Jesus points out the danger in pursuing seats of honor. He tells the story of a wedding where someone quickly grabs a high seat of honor. But then a person more distinguished walks in, and the host insists that the interloper vacate his position. At that point he may find all the other places occupied, so that the only course open to him is to take the lowest place, with all the shame and loss of face implied (cf. Prov. 25:7). So humiliated, the presumptuous one must head to the last seat. The description of the move down the social ladder is drawn out in Greek to underline the person’s shame (you begin with shame… to head for the last seat) It is as if every step hurts.

However, if one chooses the lowest place, the only way one can go is up. Rabbi Simeon b. Azzai is reported to have advised guests to take a place two or three seats lower than that to which they were entitled: ‘Better that people say to you “come up, come up,” and not say to you, “go down, go down”’ (Leviticus Rabbah I.5). 

Continue reading

Kokutai

Kokutai is a uniquely Japanese concept often translated as ‘national polity’ or ‘national essence.’ 

It refers to the unique constitutional and spiritual essence of the Japanese nation and its people, centered historically on the Emperor as a symbol of continuity and unity. Kokutai is not just a political constitution but a broader idea of Japan’s national identity and political order. It embodies ideas about the Emperor’s divine descent (from Amaterasu, the sun goddess), Japan’s unique historical destiny, and the special relationship between the ruler and subjects.

In prewar and wartime Japan, Kokutai was used to legitimize the Emperor’s absolute sovereignty and Japan’s political system. It was often invoked to promote national unity, loyalty, and resistance to foreign political ideas like liberal democracy or socialism. Kokutai placed the Emperor at the center of sovereignty and moral authority. This made Kokutai both a political doctrine and a national ideology that justified Japan’s imperial system and mobilized the population. 

Continue reading

Honor at Meals

The gospel for the upcoming Sunday is taken from the Gospel of Luke describing an encounter with the Pharisees at a banquet. In yesterday’s post we discussed “humility”. Today we consider “honor.” The meal setting is common in many of the gospels as a metaphor for the celebration of the Kingdom’s come. But it is also often a setting of controversy. Consider that 14:1-6 centered on the debate at table regarding the lawfulness of curing on the Sabbath – reminiscent of earlier discussions about appropriate behavior on the Sabbath (e.g., 6:2, 9; 13:14–16). When Jesus asks if it would be lawful to cure the man with dropsy, those at the table are silent. When Jesus next asks if their son or oxen fell into a cistern would they pull them out, again, they are silent. The easiest take on their reaction is that Jesus has them timid and stumped. But there was a long standing tradition for debate about the understanding of the Law. I would suggest that given Jesus’ challenging questions, one would need time to think about the reasoning – and in the face of such challenging wisdom, perhaps there is a struggle for the host to figure out exactly where this wandering preacher from Nazareth should be sitting.

That dynamic then opens the way for Jesus’ larger questions about honor at meals. Notice that vv.7-11, addressed to guests, is parallel to vv. 12-14, addressed to hosts, both showing a common pattern in which humility plays out.

Continue reading

Civil and Military Leadership in 1945 Japan

In the previous post we reviewed the legacy of battle as 1944 came to a close and noted the lethal legacy of Japanese military choices and led to one loss after another. The once powerful Combined Fleet of the Imperial Navy was but a memory. They had once roamed the western Pacific at will; now they were limited to coastal water and home island ports. The Imperial Army fared no better losing garrison after garrison, sacrificing their most experienced battlefield leaders and soldiers to death. There was no surrender. Japan wanted a “decisive victory” conclusion to conflict. What they started was a war of attrition they had no hope of winning. All the while war draws closer to the home islands. At this point one has to ask about civil and military leadership at the start of 1945.

Here is an overview of leadership dynamics and structures in January 1945 (as it had been through out the war):

  • Real decision-making power rested with the military, particularly the Army, as it had since the 1930s 
  • The civilian government had limited independence, often subordinate to military interests.
  • The Emperor held ultimate constitutional authority, but his actual role in daily governance and war policy remained ambiguous. Many war decisions were “approved” by his silence. That strikes us as strange, but that was the operative culture of governance.
Continue reading

Humility

The gospel for the upcoming Sunday is taken from the Gospel of Luke describing an encounter with the Pharisees at a banquet. A key theme from this text is “humility.” This word comes into our language from the Middle English, via Anglo-French, from Latin humilis low, humble, from “humus” the word for earth. Webster’s offers this as a definition

  1. not proud or haughty: not arrogant or assertive
  2. reflecting, expressing, or offered in a spirit of deference or submission
  3. ranking low in a hierarchy or scale: insignificant, unpretentious –or  : not costly or luxurious 

Does this capture the biblical sense of “humility?” Humility comes from the Greek tapeinoō (make low, humble; EDNT 3:334). In its verbal and noun forms, the word occurs 18 times in the NT and describes appropriate human conduct before God. And yet the use of the word often has a passive aspect to it.  For example, John the Baptist challenges his listeners to ready themselves for God’s salvation by preparing the way of the Lord and making his paths straight. The decisive feature, however, must be performed by God himself, for every valley will be filled (by him) and every mountain made low (by him), i.e., leveled.  The salvific action begins with God’s own actions. In this we are to humbly await actions from the Lord.

Continue reading

The Series Going Forward

As noted in the previous post, “War in the Pacific to this Point”, the series has focused on the strategic plans and tactical experience that has shaped the war on land and sea, and in the air. 1944 ended with the Philippine island of Leyte under Allied control. An invasion of Luzon was next with the hope that Japan would declare Manila an “open city” as MacAruthur had done in 1942.

After Luzon, the “road to Tokyo” was clear: Iwo Jima, Okinawa, and then (most likely) the southern Japanese home island of Kyushu.

This is a good point in the series to look at Japan and consider its governance, national identity, and their plans to defend the home islands. From the Allied perspective it is clear that the Imperial Japanese Army has effective control of future war plans and actions, but as allied intelligence operations reveal (via diplomatic code MAGIC) there are some misgivings about the military dominated governance. What remains a point of uncertainty is the role of Emperor Hirohito.

Continue reading

Keeping Track

The gospel for the upcoming 22nd Sunday (Year C) is taken from the Gospel of Luke. On the journey to Jerusalem one of the principal themes has been that of discipleship. Much of Luke 12 attends to that theme especially in terms of preparedness and service.  As Luke’s gospel narrative moves ahead, Jesus continues to teach about the nature of discipleship (see, judge, and act), the urgency of the decision to become a faithful and prudent disciple, and that our decisions and actions have consequences in terms of the kingdom of heaven. To that end, here is the recent progression of Sunday gospels. You’ll notice there are gaps and skips. 

Among the portions missing from the Sunday gospels are

  • Jesus’ call to read the signs of the times as well as one reads the weather in order that one may judge rightly (12:54-59)
  • The parable of the fig tree that is permitted to remain in the vineyard for another season even though it has not yet produced fruit (13:1-9)
  • A healing of a woman, afflicted for 18 years, who was healed on the Sabbath that Jesus might again teach the meaning of the kingdom of God (13:10-17)
  • The parable of the mustard seed (13:18-21)
  • The lament of Jerusalem’s unfaithfulness (13:31-35)
  • A healing on the Sabbath at table (14:2-6)
  • The parable of the great feast (14:15-24)
  • The cost of discipleship and the necessity of preparations (14:25-35)

Some of the verses missing from Sunday gospels are well covered in the gospels of daily Mass, but there are some great images (reading the signs of time, the fig tree, and others) that would be great to have for Sunday homilies. 

That being said, one does well to remember and understand that these verses come after Jesus exhortation to strive to enter that place where are gathered “Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God” (13:28) (from last Sunday’s gospel) and before the parable of the great feast (14:15-24) which speaks to the OT image of the kingdom of God as likened to a great banquet. The placement points out that the attitudes of discipleship in this life are reflected in the banquet of the kingdom of God.

This week’s gospel is at table. As Johnson [Luke, 223] notes: “If Jesus eats a meal with a Pharisee on the Sabbath, there surely will be conflict! During the meal Jesus addresses a fundamental attitude that is a constituent portion of discipleship: humility.  This is not a new topic addressed to his disciples.  Consider Luke 9: 

46 An argument arose among the disciples about which of them was the greatest. 47 Jesus realized the intention of their hearts and took a child and placed it by his side 48 and said to them, “Whoever receives this child in my name receives me, and whoever receives me receives the one who sent me. For the one who is least among all of you is the one who is the greatest.” 


Image credit: Jesus at Supper | Caravaggio (1606) | National Gallery London | PD-US

I know you

We know from St. Paul’s First Letter to Timothy that God desires that all be saved (1 Tim 2:4).  It is Paul’s way of telling that the call to salvation is offered to everyone; it echoes the message of today’s first reading from the Prophet Isaiah. We already know that is God’s desire, and yet we sometimes have the same question asked in the Gospel: “Lord, will only a few people be saved?” Jesus’ response does nothing to comfort the questioner: “Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough.” 

Scripture doesn’t tell us what is in the background of the one who asked the question. But what about us? Why are we asking? Maybe we have the same worries as they did more than 2,000 years ago. Perhaps we are worried about family members and friends gone astray. Folks who are no longer active in their faith; folks holding views on issues such as birth control, divorce and remarriage and others at the intersection of the Church and the modern world. People who have works of mercy but are without faith, will they be saved?

Continue reading

Reflection: the doorkeeper

Alan Culpepper, at the end of his commentary [277-78] on Luke 13:22-30, provides an interesting story from Franz Kafka:

His parable “Before the Law” is the story of a man from the country who seeks admission to the Law. When the doorkeeper tells him he may not enter, he looks through the open door, but the doorkeeper warns him that he is just the first of a series of doorkeepers, each one more terrible than the one before. So the man waits for the doorkeeper’s permission to enter. For days and then years, the man talks with the doorkeeper, answers his questions, and attempts to bribe him, but with no success. The doorkeeper takes the man’s bribes, saying he is only doing so in order that the man will not think he has neglected anything. As the man lies dying, he sees a radiance streaming from the gateway to the Law. Thinking of one question he has not asked, he beckons the doorkeeper and asks him why in all those years no one else has come to that gate. The doorkeeper responds: “No one else could ever be admitted here, since this gate was made only for you. Now I am going to shut it.”

There is an incompleteness one experiences after reading “Before the Law.” It seems as though the man from the country is caught in a terrible institutional “catch-52,” unable to enter the very gate prepared only for him. Some might quickly focus on the gatekeeper as representative of the worst parts of organized religion, or the trap of fear implied in a series of other terrible gatekeepers, or other parts of the parable. 

There is also an incompleteness – or better said – mystery in Jesus’ parable in which the who and how many are never answered to the reader’s satisfaction. But Jesus is clear on several points: one must strive. As noted before, striving with an athlete’s power and intention is seeking an Olympic medal. The man from the country in Kafka’s parable waits for “the Law” to come to him.

All of this points to questions that have bedeviled Christianity since its foundation: what is the balance of grace, election, free will, the action to which people are called, and so much more. Perhaps even if Christian denominations will never agree on the theological balance or answers, we can agree that one should never presume upon God’s grace or God’s gifts.

Perhaps this parable asks us to take this attitude in life: strive as though admission to the kingdom depended entirely on your own doing, but know that ultimately it depends on God’s grace.


Image credit: Pexels | Farouk Tokluoglu | CC-BY