Special Attack Forces – Kamikaze

When it became clear that the Mariana Islands (Saipan, Tinian and Guam) had been taken over by the Allies, the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) Journal recorded: “We can no longer direct the war with any hope of success. The only course left is for Japan’s one hundred million people to sacrifice their lives by charging the enemy to make them lose the will to fight.”  The Japanese military would implement that plan in the Special Attack Forces and would promote their sacrifice to the general population as a means of propaganda and to animate and reinforce the resolve of the Japanese people to be willing to sacrifice their lives for the Emperor.

The air battles at Philippine Sea in June 1944 decimated the Japanese Navy’s (IJN) aviation capability for aircraft carrier based operations. The IJN and IJA aviation units (planes and pilots) were further reduced by the air battles over Formosa (Taiwan) in October 1944. Between the two engagements, Japanese losses were approximately 800 planes and 900 airmen. The critical loss was skilled and experienced pilots. Japan’s aircraft production peaked at about 2,572 planes per month in September 1944, then began to decline from late 1944 into 1945 as strategic bombing increasingly disrupted output, though production hovered above 1,000 combat aircraft per month until mid‑1945. They could replace the planes more easily than the aviators.

At the start of WWII, Japan had 2,600 airplanes of all types. The average pilot had 500-700 flight hours. They reached a peak in January 1944 – approximately 5,600 planes and despite the 1944 losses, they began 1945 with some 4,100 planes. But by 1945 the average Army pilot had only 130 hours of flight time; a Japanese naval aviator had 275 hours on average. The net effect was an enfeebled air combat capability.

By late 1943 Japanese officers began to see the slow devolution of capability and began to advocate for organized suicide attacks. There was no consensus on the idea.  On May 27, 1944 an Army pilot intentionally crashed into an allied ship (IJN Journal). Within a month, as Saipan was about to fall, Fleet Admiral Prince Hiroyasu (former chief of the Naval General Staff) openly spoke: “Both Army and Navy must think up some special weapons and conduct the war with them.” “Special weapons” was the Japanese euphemism for suicide weapons. Only a year before the idea had been rejected.

The first organized air kamikaze attack occurred on October 25, 1944 at the Battle of Leyte Gulf (Sommar) in the Philippines against Task Force Taffy 1 which consisted of escort carriers and destroyers. The Japanese force was led by Lt. Seki Yukio and Hiroshi Nishizawa, two of Japan’s premier naval aviators; each of the ace aviators.  Eighteen kamikaze took off; six returned having failed to find a target – a common feature on such missions. The remaining dozen scored damaging hits on the escort carriers Santee and Kitkun Bay, killing 17, but sank the St. Lo leaving 114 dead.

Nishizawa’s role was observer. He returns to base and reports the great success of the mission. What was to that point an idea, now became a tactic. The experience at the Battle of Philippine Sea revealed two major advantages held by the US Fleet: aviation and anti-aircraft defense.  By the summer of 1944, the  US Navy had superior aircraft, better pilots, and superior numbers – all being controlled by the first Combat Information Center (CIC) that coordinated sorties, targets, and missions by integrating radar and message traffic. In 1942 “first detect” range was ~30 miles. By 1944 that range was extended to 100 miles making the first intercept miles away from the aircraft carriers. If they got past that gauntlet, the enemy pilots faced the next advantage.

By 1944 the carriers were protected by defense-in-depth from destroyers to light cruisers that were intentionally outfitted, not for ship-to-ship engagement, but for anti-aircraft (AA) defense. These ships were “armed to the teeth.” In addition, the VT fused shells (proximity weapons) increased the lethality 5-7 times. In 1942 the fleet was capable of firing 32,000 lb/minute in AA weapons fire. In 1944, with the advent of the VT-fused shells, the fleet was capable of effectively firing 575,000 lbs/min.

In a sad calculus of thinking, all the above made clear that a Japanese battle plan to mount a torpedo or dive bomb attack against the US Fleet was not likely to succeed and had an almost zero chance of the pilot returning. The conventional mission gave way to the reality of the one-way mission, now almost a given – and from this was born the battle plan of the divine wind, kamikaze.

What are we seeing?

For the survivors of Taffy 1’s ships they had to wonder what they had just seen. Were the pilots intentionally crashing into ships? Word spread rapidly through the 3rd Fleet. From Admiral to sailor all began to wonder how could these aviators were suddenly suicide bombers? What could possibly drive them? The answer to that question lay deep inside the military culture of Japan.

Kusunoki Masashige was a 14th-century samurai and retainer of Emperor Go-Daigo. He was known for his absolute loyalty to Emperor Go-Daigo during the struggle to overthrow the Kamakura shogunate. He was admired for his strategic brilliance, his defensive stand at Chihaya Castle, and—most famously—his willingness to obey the emperor’s command to fight a hopeless battle at Minatogawa (1336). Knowing he would die, Kusunoki went into battle anyway, sacrificing himself for imperial loyalty. He died in combat along with his brother and many of his men. Because of this, he came to be revered as the archetype of the loyal retainer who sacrifices himself for duty and country.

In the early 20th century, especially during the rise of State Shintō and Japanese militarism, Kusunoki was lionized as a national hero and portrayed as the embodiment of bushidō: selfless loyalty, obedience, and honor in death. A massive bronze statue of him, erected in 1900, stands in front of  the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, symbolizing martial devotion to the emperor. By the 1930s and 40s, Kusunoki was the center piece and model of what it meant to be, not just in the Japanese military, but as a citizen of Japan. His story and his devotion to the Emperor was part of school textbooks and state propaganda. He was the personification of a Japanese person: a warrior who placed loyalty above life itself. His famous dying words lamenting “Would that I had seven lives to give for my country” (“Shichishō Hōkoku”). School children memorized his words and were repeatedly taught his story with his statue becoming a pilgrimage site.

Kusunoki gave a historical precedent that made the kamikaze sacrifice seem like part of a long Japanese tradition, not an aberration. By portraying suicide attacks as the modern version of Kusunoki’s doomed battle, leaders could frame the kamikaze not as desperate measures but as honorable continuity. “Seven lives for the emperor” became a rallying cry for the kamikaze pilots.

This was the ethos of the WW II Japanese military and citizenry. Now the aviators were urged to live and die in the same spirit. One need only search for internet images of kamikaze unit flyers. Most of them show young men in their aviator kits with samurai swords. 

What the US sailors were seeing was the spirit of Kusunoki Masashige, not on horseback, but piloting lethal, ship-killing missiles.

Okinawa

On April 6, 1945, the first wave of ten coordinated kamikaze attacks began to hit the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet off the coast of Okinawa. Ships in the Fifth Fleet had experienced suicide attacks before — but never on such a scale. The terrifying sight of Japanese pilots diving their planes into ships would become common over the next two and a half months. Aircraft carriers and battleships were supposed to be the main targets, but the ships that suffered the most damage were the destroyers and smaller vessels assigned to protect the fleet from incoming attacks. And as the war continued, troop ships, tankers, and supply ships were increasingly targeted.

From October 1944 until the end of the war, there were some 3,000 sorties flown. This resulted in the loss of 3,389 naval personnel. In total, by the end of July 1945 kamikaze attacks damaged 350 ships (including  30 aircraft carriers) and sank 47.

Invasion Planning and Threat of Kamikaze

According to the postwar Strategic Bombing Survey, Japanese airpower at the end of the was: 5,350 aircraft (combat, advanced trainers and primary trainers) assigned to Special Attack units with an additional 5,300 not yet assigned. In addition, there were another 7,200 aircraft in need of repair. Operationally there were as many as 10,000 available aircraft and some 18,000 pilots with at least 70 hours of flight experience. The survey also noted that there were 1 million barrels of aviation fuel on hand. The planned kamikaze missions were only expected to require 50,000 barrels.

Advanced planning for the coming allied invasion of Kyushu included suicide sorties in waves of 300 to 400 planes every hour with the primary targets being troop transports. This would be more kamikazes in three hours than sent against the Okinawa campaign in three months.

There would be a major difference between Okinawa and Kyushu. The Okinawa attacks required long flights over open water through rings of scouting places, radar picket ships, and combat air patrols. The waves of attacks were always seen in advance, weather/cloud cover permitting. The experience in the Philippines was different: shorter flights, ground clutter affecting radar, and other topographic factors lead to more stealth and thus surprise attacks.  At Kyushu the troop transports would lay in conventional disposition close to the coast allowing the kamikaze to burst upon the scene with little warning.

That being said, ULTRA identified most of the kamikaze bases and these would be subject to advanced air attack. This was something that the Japanese realized and initiated new efforts of dispersal and concealment away from the base. They estimated that no more than 20% of aircraft would be destroyed on the ground prior to missions. In addition new production of suicide planes were wood construction: easy to move, shorter runways needed, not easily detected by radar, and far less vulnerable to the proximity fused antiaircraft shell.

Clearly, the airborne kamikaze attacks were a significant threat to lives and shipping. But these were not the only Special Attack units. Other units/means included:

  • Shinyo – Suicide Motorboats. Small, fast, one-man boats packed with 250–300 kg of explosives in the bow. Around 6,000 were built.
  • Kaiten – Manned Suicide Torpedoes. These were modified Type 93 “Long Lance” torpedoes with a cockpit for a pilot. The unit was launched from submarines with the pilot guiding the weapon to its target. They had limited success but were responsible for sinking the USS Mississinewa (AO-59) in November 1944.
  • Ohka (“Cherry Blossom”) – Rocket-Powered Manned Bomb. Small, rocket-propelled glide bomb carried under a bomber, piloted by a kamikaze. The Ohka was to be released near the target to glide/rocket into a ship at high speed.Used mainly in 1945, especially against US ships off Okinawa.
  • Fukuryu and Maru Dai – both were “frogmen” with either explosive packages or mines to attach to ships.

This all indicates the extent of the June 1944 decision to develop “special weapons.”

That is the mindset and future facing Kyushu invasion planners. What follows is the experience of those who survived kamikaze attacks.


Shipboard perspective (Source: PBS – American Experience: Victory in the Pacific, “Kamikaze”)

One such destroyer was the U.S.S. Newcomb. The Newcomb had seen combat before, at the Mariana Islands, Peleliu, Palau and in the Philippines. But it was at Okinawa that she would fight her fiercest battle. On board the destroyer was 21-year-old John Chapman, a First Class Boatswains Mate, and gun captain of a five-inch gun. Facing enemy pilots willing to give their lives to sink his ship struck him as almost incomprehensible.

“It didn’t make you feel good. I don’t know whether that’s ‘terrified’ or not, but it didn’t make you feel too well because of it, knowing that people would do a thing like that. You know, people we had always known weren’t like that. They were brave people and so forth, and they fight, but weren’t someone to just deliberately take their lives to take yours.”

Watching Kamikazes Attack. More than 300 kamikazes departed Southern Kyushu on April 6. Their target was the U.S. Fifth Fleet stationed in support of the battle being waged on Okinawa. As the Japanese pilots approached, they broke off into smaller attack groups. John Chapman was at his gun post at the stern of the U.S.S. Newcomb.

“There was probably 45 planes in the air. Well, it was a scary situation, because you knew that they were going to dive on you. You could be firing on the aircraft, and they’d come right on, just keep coming right on through that. And you’d see pieces flying over the planes and everything else, and they’d just keep right on a-coming.”

A Roaring Inferno. The Newcomb shot down four enemy planes. Five others hit the ship. Those on board who were not killed or injured fought desperately not only to put out the raging fires and repair damaged engines, but also to keep firing at an enemy dead set on sinking them. The scene aboard the Newcomb was repeated on many vessels of the fleet that day.

“It was hot. The fires were just raging totally out of control. Between the bridge and the afterdeck house, that’s a big percent of the ship. It was nothing but a roaring inferno. The flames were shooting. They said [it] was high as 1,000 feet in the air off the Newcomb.”

Overboard. Firefighters battling the raging fires forced John Chapman and an injured friend to jump overboard. There was no space left for them on the stern to remain. Chapman handed his life belt to the injured friend and, once in the water, towed him to the safety of a lifeboat. They were later rescued along with many others in the waters off Okinawa.

Aftermath. Ninety-one sailors were killed or wounded on the U.S.S. Newcomb. Many of those who were injured suffered devastating burns. But despite suffering at the hands of the five kamikazes, the crew of the Newcomb kept their vessel afloat and earned the Navy Unit Commendation and eight battle stars for World War II service. John Chapman would earn a bronze star for his service; years later, his view of his heroism is clear-eyed:

“People try to glorify wars and so forth. There’s people that do outstanding things, but there’s nothing really glorious about a war. You do wars to protect your country if you have to, and that’s the only time you should ever do it.”

Terrible Naval Losses. Nine more waves of kamikaze attacks hit the fleet off of Okinawa before the battle came to an end. Almost 2,000 Japanese pilots would willingly lose their lives in these attacks.

By late June 1945, close to 5,000 U.S. sailors had been killed and 5,000 more wounded by the Japanese suicide pilots. Thirty ships had been sunk and almost 400 others were damaged. The attack on the Fifth Fleet off Okinawa would mark the worst losses of World War II for the U.S. Navy.


Source: PBS – American Experience: Victory in the Pacific, “Kamikaze” (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/pacific-john-chapman/

Image credit: various photographs from Naval Aviation Museum, National World War II Museum, and US Navy Archives.

Mining the Sea Lanes

In May of 1942 the Japanese Empire covered 10 million square miles and extended from Manchuria, China and Korea eastward to the International Dateline and southward to the Philippines, Dutch East Indies, Java, Borneo, Sumatra and Malaya. The shape of the Empire was as though a lopsided, bottom heavy pear with Japan located at the top near the stem. As an island nation massively importing oil, rubber, iron, bauxite, aluminum, all manner of raw materials – and food – it was completely dependent on shipping to fuel the war machine, supply its armed forces, and feed the people on the home islands. 

A blockade of Japan was, from the beginning of the war, a primary objective of the Allies. The island empire was surrounded by shallow, mineable water. Her crowded people depended on imports for 20 per cent of their food; nutritional standards were so low that a mere one-fifth reduction of imports meant privation for the population. Japan’s war effort and manufacturing potential depended on imports for 90 per cent of all oil, 88 per cent of all iron, 24 per cent of all coal. Over half of all domestic coal was waterborne between mine and factory. Even in-country domestic transport depended in large part on coastal craft transport because the geography of Japan made rail and road development problematic

On December 7, 1941 Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold R. Stark authorized unrestricted submarine operations against all Japanese ships – combatant or merchant. An earlier post on the topic described the slowly building strangulation of merchant shipping over the course of the war. By 1945, Japan no longer had access to 90–95% of the oil/fuel it had been importing. There were similar impacts of the other raw materials imported from the southern reaches of the Empire. By 1945 the open ocean sea lanes from Borneo, Java, Indonesia, French Indochina (Vietnam) and all points in Southeast Asia were heavily patrolled by American, British and Dutch submarines. As described in the Big Blue Fleet post, the fast carrier fleet and land based allied aircraft were beginning to take a serious toll on Japanese shipping. The cumulative effect was a slow tightening of the blockade. 

The submarine blockade had virtually stopped water-borne traffic to and from the huge east coast ports of Tokyo, Yokohama, and Nagoya but a vast amount of shipping still passed into the smaller west coast ports facing the Inland Sea (Sea of Japan) after passing through Shimonoseki Strait and the Bungo Suido. These were the only “safe” sea lanes: the Sea of Japan, the Yellow Sea, and the straits and inter-island passages within Japan. And even that was about to change.

Submarines already had been laying mines in the Sea of Japan and near west coast Japanese ports with some effect. The Sea of Japan was a dangerous operating area for allied submarines due to shallow water and lack of accurate charts. The Japanese still provided air patrols and combat coverage for shipping in the Sea of Japan and the Combined Fleet dedicated destroyers to merchant escort duty. Submarines could carry 24-40 sea mines, but that meant the submarines did not have torpedoes. Each patrol had to balance the torpedo/mine loadout. In late 1944 Admiral Nimitz requested that his naval operations be augmented by extensive mining of Japan’s “safe sea lanes” by the US Army Air Force (AAF) operating out of Tinian and Saipan.

Now that the B-29s had the ‘reach’ to cover the same area, they only needed the mission to drop mines in designated areas. They were far more capable of delivering large numbers of anti-shipping mines in short amounts of time. It took time for the AAF to agree to the mission and then to modify the B-29s for the mine dropping mission. Nimitz had hoped the operation could have commenced in January, as the attrition of enemy merchant shipping might have considerably reduced Japanese resistance by the time of the Okinawa assault.

The mining campaign of the safe sea lanes and non-East coast ports was initiated by the Tinian-based B-29s on 27 March 1945: Operation Starvation. The title was meant to convey the goal: starving Japan’s war machine of needed raw materials and oil, as well as starving people on the home islands who depended on the net import of rice and raw fish. Marine merchant traffic between Japan and the Asiatic mainland grew scarce. Manchurian imports dropped. Major General William F. Sharp, an American POW in Siberia, watched lines of loaded freight cars grow longer, waiting for Japanese ships which never came. The goods were available; the transport ships were not. 

Factories which had survived continued strategic bombing raids operated at reduced levels or not at all. “It was not only the bombing of factories that defeated us,” said Takashi Komatsu of the Nippon Steel Tube Company, after the war was over, “it was the blockade which deprived us of essential raw materials— aluminum and coal.” Hisanobu Terai, president of NYK, Japan’s biggest shipping line, blamed food and raw materials shortages for the defeat and claimed that in the last months “proportions of shipping sunk were one by sub, six by bombs, twelve by mines.” The proportions were not technically correct, but the statement was indicative of the sense of the growing frustration and fear of the industrial sector of Japan’s war economy.

In addition to the havoc brought to bear on Japanese shipping, U. S. mines kept Japanese mine sweeping forces busy. At least 20,000 men and 349 ships attempted to keep sea lanes and harbors open during the blockade. Three out of every four minesweepers were lost. Speaking for all Japanese mine experts, Captain Kyuzo Tamura, Imperial Japanese Navy, told postwar interrogators, “The result of B-29 mining was so effective against the shipping that it eventually starved the country. I think you probably could have shortened the war by beginning earlier.”

Shipping losses continued, and seagoing traffic dwindled to a mere trickle. Merchants not sunk were in need of repair, but only 3 of the 22 principal merchant marine shipyards were open because access was closed due to sea mining. Damaged merchant ships were as good as sunk; there was no way to repair them.

Shortages of coal, oil, salt, and food were coming close to eliminating what Japanese industry survived the bombing raids. Japan’s leading industrialists could see the end coming. By mid-July they warned military leaders that if the war went on another year, as many as 7 million Japanese might die of starvation.

Mines sank or damaged over 670 ships, accounting for more than 1.25 million tons of shipping. Shipping through major areas like Kobe declined by 85% from March to July 1945

As an island nation dependent on outside sources of oil, raw materials, and foodstuffs, Japan was uniquely vulnerable to sea mine warfare. The AAF launched 1,529 sorties and laid 12,135 mines in 26 fields on 46 separate missions. A total of 670 ships were sunk or damaged, accounting for more than 1.25 million shipping tons. 

Eventually most of the major ports and straits of Japan were repeatedly mined, severely disrupting Japanese logistics and troop movements for the remainder of the war with 35 of 47 essential convoy routes having to be abandoned. This operation sank more ship tonnage in the last six months of the war than the efforts of all other sources combined during the same period.


Image credit: various photographs from Naval Aviation Museum, National World War II Museum, and US Navy Archives.

From Theory to Firestorm

Across military histories of the War in the Pacific the phrase “strategic bombing” is used and refers to B-29 Superfortresses flying out of the Mariana Islands (Saipan, Tinian, and Guam) and bombing the Japanese home islands of Honshu and Kyushu. Strategic bombing was an idea that grew out of the experience of air power in the First World War. Military theorists such as airpower advocates like the Italian Giulio Douhet, Britain’s Hugh Trenchard, and General William “Billy” Mitchell became influential in shaping the concept during the 1920s and 1930s. Douhet’s The Command of the Air (1921) and Mitchell’s Winged Defense (1925) became the starting point of thought and planning about the future of air warfare, strategic bombing in particular.

In Winged Defense Mitchell predicted that Japan would one day be America’s principal Pacific rival and that Tokyo itself could be struck by long-range strategic bombers launched from Pacific islands. His ideas were considered to be influential in a general way in the development of War Plan Orange but he was not personally involved in such planning. Nonetheless, the idea of strategic bombing had been planted.

Continue reading

Naval Air and Shore Bombardment

During the early 1945 the war in the Pacific was inexorably drawing closer to the Japanese home islands. There were two major campaigns that were initiated in the Winter and early Spring:

  • Iwo Jima (Feb 19 – Mar 26, 1945)
  • Okinawa (Apr – Jun 1945)

Each of these campaigns were within range of Japanese aviation forces based on Kyushu and Honshu. A critical element of the above campaigns was the suppression of those aviation forces. That work fell to the U.S. Navy. 

The Navy, freed from most major fleet engagements after the Philippine Sea and Leyte Gulf, shifted to directly attacking the Japanese homeland with multiple purposes in mind: suppression of aviation support for Okinawa and Iwo Jima; damage to industrial facilities, disruption of coastal shipping; elimination of the remnants of Japan’s Combined Fleet; disruption of rail-ferry links between Hokkaido and Honshu; cutting a key source of food shipments; disruption of the rail supply system leading from the Tokyo industrial area southward toward Kyushu and; presenting to the Japanese people that the Allied Forces could strike at will.

In February 1945 the first major aircraft raids were conducted in the Tokyo area. The objective was to neutralize Japanese air power prior to the Iwo Jima landings. Carrier aircraft from Task Force 58 struck Tokyo, Yokosuka, and nearby airfields, shipyards, and factories. Over 500 Japanese aircraft were destroyed (majority on the ground), some naval units damaged, including the carrier Amagi. 

In the months following, US carriers pre-emptively struck Japan in preparation for the Okinawa landings. From April through June the US carriers supported the ongoing Okinawa operations by striking airfields in nearby Japan when necessary. Finally, by July 1945 Okinawa was secure and the full attention of the  US and British fleets (carriers, battleships, cruisers and destroyers) could turn their attention to shore bombardment of Japan from Kyushu in the south to Hokkaido in the north with Honshu in between. While their reach was limited their accuracy was deadly. In late July the industrial and electronics-producing city of Hitachi was subject to shore bombardment. A key factory that had avoided destruction by air assault was level with four hits from the 16-inch guns of a US battleship.

While the July 1945 naval bombardment received little coverage, there are several key elements revealed regarding the state of the war in the Pacific:

  • Naval ships (carriers, battleships, cruisers, etc.) could approach the coast with impunity. By way of analogy, Japan was a medieval castle under siege. Outside the “walls” the Allied forces were free to operate; inside there was nothing to do except endure
  • At the same time, the Naval aviators and US Army Air Force bombers also operated without restriction.
  • The Allied fleet was free to aggressively sweep Home Island waters searching for Japanese warships and merchantmen. 

The primary focus of this undeterred bombardment from sea and air was focused on Operation Olympic, the invasion of Kyushu. Targets included:

  • Pre-invasion bombardment of potential Kyushu landing beaches and the inland areas immediately adjacent to the beaches to begin the “softening” on the in-depth defense and on-going construction of the same.
  • Japanese airfields and aircraft production sites in order to minimize the operational capacity and ability to mount kamikaze attacks during
  • Transportation lines and hubs that would be used to supply/re-supply Kyushu (Japan was particularly dependent on coast shipping and railways as they had little to no developed roadways)
  • Coastal shipping and merchants attempting to import supplies – including food – to Japan

At this point, by any effective measure, Japan was under an almost complete blockade. Only the Korea-Japan shipping channels were available and only under the cover of weather which limited the ability of the allies to find and track the merchants.


Image credit: various photographs from Naval Aviation Museum, National World War II Museum, and US Navy Archives.

Allied Firebombing

The capture of the Saipan  and Tinian (July 1944) gave the allies air bases for the B-29 Super Fortress bombers.  The home islands of Japan were within range and the Allies were now able to initiate sustained bombing of Japan without risking aircraft carriers which would have operated within range of Japanese counter attacks. The B-29 raids began on November 24, 1944. Tokyo was the first target. It consisted of 111 B-29s striking the Musashino aircraft engine plant on the outskirts of Tokyo. The raid was executed as a high-altitude precision raid (but with little effect). As noted in a previous post, the Allies faced major challenges over Japan: high-altitude jet stream winds disrupted bombing accuracy; weather conditions, especially cloud cover, reduced visibility. 

The bombing campaign was focused on Japanese cities. The goal was to destroy key industrial and military targets such as aircraft factories, shipyards, and transportation hubs. The strategy was modeled on the efforts against Nazi Germany which concentrated production in large factory settings.  Japanese industry was decentralized, with small workshops spread throughout urban residential areas. These workshops were as small as home-based, then feeding large operations, still in residential areas, again working up the supply chains to large operations, often located on the edge of residential areas. While there were critical war production located apart from residential areas, e.g. shipyards, other production (ammunition, airplane assembly, weapons, etc) took place in the labyrinth of major city residential areas.

Continue reading

Allied Bombing – The First Phase

There was an early phase of B-29 bombings on the Japanese home islands as part of Operation Matterhorn. These were planes launched from China. The airfields in China were highly vulnerable. Supplies and logistics had to be flown over the Himalaya Mountains. There were no accompanying fighter escorts. Targets were typically industrial or military facilities near western coastal cities (e.g., steel works, shipyards, aircraft plants). Damage was limited due to small bomb loads, long flight distances, and weather conditions. All in all, the raids were psychologically unsettling, but neither tactically or strategically valuable. 

That began to change in late November 1944.

Continue reading

Before the Bombing – History and Context

Before we delve into the aerial bombing campaign, we should consider an event which was seared into the minds of Tokyo and Yokohama residents – an event which shaped emergency preparedness: the 1923 Tokyo earthquake, also known as the Great Kantō Earthquake (the Kantō plane is the broad area on Honshu island that encompasses some of the great cities of Japan)

The earthquake struck on September 1, 1923, at noon when people were cooking lunch. The ~8.0 magnitude earthquake caused extensive damage that was further exacerbated by widespread fires that swept across the wooden neighborhoods of Tokyo and Yokohama. Both cities were devastated as well as surrounding prefectures. The earthquake caused over 130 fires, some of which merged into firestorms. The most infamous was in the Hongō district, where around 38,000 people perished in an open space where they had taken refuge – heat and oxygen deprivation caused by the firestorm being principal causes.

Tokyo’s infrastructure—including roads, bridges, water supply, and railways—was either damaged or destroyed, crippling transportation and communication. Yokohama, then a major international port, was almost entirely flattened. An estimated 105,000–142,000 people were killed, with over 570,000 homes destroyed leaving more than a million people homeless. The event and its aftermath reshaped Japan’s approach to urban planning, emergency preparedness, and national resilience. 

Continue reading

Requiem for a Battleship

The final death blow to the Japanese Imperial Navy occurred during the Battle of Okinawa – the sinking of the super-battleship Yamato. This pride of the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) was named after Japan itself, IJN Yamato, the historic name for Japan and was the pride of the nation.

Yamato was the largest warship ever built up to that time. Compared to ships of the time it was simply a monster. It carried larger guns (18-inch) than any warship and could fire a 3,200 lb armor-piercing projectile more than 26 miles. For reference, a Ford Escape weighs about 3,200 lbs. 26 miles, as the crow flies, is about the distance from the White House to the runways at Dulles International Airport. It was armored to withstand the impact of a 3,200 lb armor-piercing shell. And it was fast.

Continue reading

The Brutality of the Asia-Pacific War

The historian Richard B. Franks is noted for his exhaustive research centered on World War II in the Pacific – or as he emphasizes, the Asia-Pacific War. While the major combatants in the region were Japan vs. primarily the United States/Australia/New Zealand/Britain/Netherlands, Franks’ research reminds the reader that there was no nation in the Asia-Pacific region that was not impacted by Japanese occupation. In an early post, Civilian Deaths, we considered that between 1936-1945 the Empire of Japan was responsible for some 30 million civilian deaths. By and large these were not combat deaths, but were deaths by slave labor, starvation, deprivation and disease in places like Burma, Vietnam (then known as French Indochina), Korea, Indonesia, China and the Philippines. The point Franks is making is the effect of the narrow vision of the historical revisionists (in Frank’s mind) who argue that the use of atomic weapons could not be justified by an argument of saving American lives lost during an invasion of the home islands. Franks argues that ending the war as soon as any means was available was about ending massive Asian deaths in the Japanese-occupied/controlled areas of the Empire outside of the home islands. In the last 12 months of the war, 1 million people died in Vietnam due to starvation and disease.

Franks worries that history is being lost/ignored in academic circles of historians in the West and in Asia. At a recent meeting of historical scholars of the Asia Pacific region, in the sessions on World War II, there seemed to be a general unawareness of the widespread death among Asia people as the scholars only focused on allied inflicted casualties on the Japanese people of the home islands (blockade, bombing, fire bombing and ultimately the atomic bombs). While those are valid areas of historical research and consideration, it loses context of a larger war – one that the Empire of Japan started and prosecuted with a brutality to Asian people that was rooted in racism, ultranationalism, and a manifest destiny of greater Japan.

One often overlooked aspect of Catholic teaching on just-war theory is that it exists, in part, to protect the humanity of the war fighters. Much strategic war planning and just-war theorizing operates – as it should – on the “big picture.” But “big pictures” can be a composite of small pictures: the experience of battles, but also the discovery of what had come before the battle. All of this shapes and frames the picture of the next battle and the next strategy. It shapes the mindset of the war fighters as well as the war planners.

This week the posts have addressed the combat in Manila, Iwo Jima, the naval battle of Okinawa, civilian deaths and more. But I want to pause and return to the Philippines. US Army and Naval personnel had a long rich history and connection to the Philippines before the war – many having resided in the islands for 20 years or more. Their return to the Philippines in 1944 and 1945 was shocking. Before the 1944 landings at Leyte and 1945 landings at Luzon, the allies were receiving guerilla reports of deteriorating conditions in and around Manila, the treatment of POWs at Camp O’Donnell and Cabanatuan, the condition of American civilians interned at Santo Tomas College, the state of prisons and other detention facilities, and more. It was different to become an eye witness. 

What was discovered had a profound emotional and psychological effect on American soldiers as well as the U.S. public when they learned about Japanese atrocities in the Philippines. The effect cannot be overstated. It had a direct impact on the ferocity of combat and the American public’s perception of the Pacific War.

American forces came face to face with evidence of years of brutal Japanese occupation. At the POW camps (Cabanatuan and Camp O’Donnell), thousands of U.S. and Filipino prisoners had died of starvation, disease, and abuse. Those liberated were emaciated, confirming the worst fears of the US authorities and their brothers in arms. At civilian internment camps such as Santo Tomás and Los Baños, internees (Americans, Europeans, and others) were found near starvation. The Los Baños raid in February 1945 was driven in part by intelligence that the Japanese planned to massacre the civilians. After the Battle of Manila, U.S. soldiers saw the aftermath of systematic atrocities — civilians bayoneted, burned, and shot, including women and children. About 100,000 civilians were killed in one month. The guerilla reports were no longer an abstraction. 

In a letter home, one of the soldiers on the mission to liberate Santo Tomás wrote: “I thought I had seen suffering before, but when I walked through those gates and saw our own people, little children with their bones showing through their skin, I knew then why we were here.” It was a boost to morale knowing they were liberating their countrymen and Filipinos, reinforcing their sense of mission. The soldiers saw themselves not only as fighting an enemy but as rescuers. 

A veteran of the Cabanatuan raid wrote of the liberated POWs: “They were skeletons in rags. It was like walking into a graveyard where the dead still breathed. Every man in our unit swore he’d never forget what the Japs had done to them.” Many soldiers described these experiences as creating a hatred of the Japanese after seeing what had been done to POWs and civilians. Some veterans admitted it hardened their reluctance to take prisoners in combat – as well as instilling a latent rage and desire for vengeance that needed to be addressed.

Among U.S. troops word spread quickly. Letters home, informal briefings, and direct eyewitness testimony circulated through units. Even soldiers who hadn’t seen the camps firsthand knew the stories” by mid-1945.

After the Battle of Manila, Time Magazine, March 12, 1945 wrote: “Manila is dead. Its people were butchered in their homes, its buildings reduced to ash. In Asia, as in Europe, atrocity is the enemy’s chosen weapon.” In his book Rampage, James A. Scott reaches the same conclusion, but makes the point that it did not begin at the battle of Manila.  It began the day the Japanese reached the Philippines. And perhaps MacArthur and US leadership should have expected how this unfolded. It has been the same in China in 1937 with the “Rape of Nanjing.”

Across the U.S. press, editors made sure to highlight parallels between Japanese actions in Manila and Nazi crimes in Europe, reinforcing the idea that this was a war of civilization against barbarism.  The point is being made that where in Europe the atrocities were committed by the elite German SS troops, in the Pacific it was the practice of the entire Japanese Imperial Army. In parallel, the Office of War Information (OWI) and Army public affairs highlighted these stories, both to inform the homefront but also to justify the sacrifices of the ongoing campaigns.

The reports fed a strong belief that the Japanese leadership (and by extension, the nation) bore collective guilt for barbarity. This made the American public more accepting of the war’s escalating violence, including strategic bombing of cities and, later, the atomic bombings.

Perhaps the most intrinsic purpose of Just War Theory is the protection of humanity, not just of society, but of the war fighters. Many of these Army units would be slated for the Nov 1945 invasion of the Japanese home islands. As Iwo Jima and Okinawa showed, resistance would be furious. As the naval battle off Okinawa demonstrated, the attacks would be maniacle and suicidal.

One of the dynamics of extended warfare is habituation. One begins to get used to civilians used as combat troops – it’s what “they do.” One begins to see the use of flame throwers and flame tanks as proven tactics to eradicate entrenched enemy positions because you know they won’t surrender. And they don’t. Soldiers carry the eye witness accounts of the enemy’s brutality and cruelty – and the grapevine carries the stories to the larger audience in theatre and at home. Some things can not be unseen.

1945 is a year of escalating violence increasingly seen as against an enemy who deserved no quarter. It is a year when the enemy will not surrender and yet there is a wider issue than just winning a war. It is stopping the crimes against humanity that have ravaged the Asia-Pacific nations since 1936.

One way or the other the war will end. As Major General Graves Erskin, USMC, said of Iwo Jima, “Victory was never in doubt.  Its cost was. …What was in doubt, in all our minds, was whether there would be any of us left to dedicate our cemetery at the end.”

The war will end. Victory was not in doubt, only the cost to humanity and to human life. And not just the soldiers, sailors, and aviators of allied forces, but to people of countries of the 10 million square miles that was the Empire of Japan at its height in 1942.


Image credit: various photographs from Naval Aviation Museum, National World War II Museum, and US Navy Archives.

Okinawa: On the Road to Downfall

The vast number of islands that were invaded/recaptured by the Allied forces were not highly occupied by civilian populations. Iwo Jima had virtually no inhabitants. Very different experiences were encountered on Saipan, in the Philippines, and on especially on Okinawa whose pre-invasion civilian population was estimated at 300,000 people. Okinawans were Japanese citizens, at least in law.

After the 1879 annexation of the Ryukyu Kingdom, Okinawa was made a prefecture of Japan. By the time of the Allied landings, Okinawans were Japanese citizens in law: subject to conscription, taxation, and wartime mobilization like all other Japanese. Their cultural and social status was something different. The longer and deeper roots of Okinawa were Chinese in custom and perspective and as a result, Okinawans were often regarded by mainland Japanese as a peripheral or inferior people, with distinct language, customs, and history. The Okinawan (Ryukyuan) language was suppressed in schools in favor of standard Japanese. Children caught speaking Okinawan dialects were sometimes punished. Mainland Japanese officials and soldiers stationed in Okinawa frequently treated locals as less disciplined, less loyal, or “not quite Japanese.” 

Prior to 1944, Okinawans could join the Japanese military but were rarely assigned to combat ranks, most often serving in labor units, auxiliary roles, or support services. After the fall of Saipan in July 1944, Japan recognized that Okinawa was likely to be the next U.S. target. At that point the 32nd Japanese Army was stationed on Okinawa, and the Japanese authorities began mass mobilization of the Okinawan population. The mobilization had three primary elements:

Continue reading