Until Heaven And Earth Pass Away

18 Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” It is notable that “the prophets” are not mentioned again in Matthew 5; the focus seems to now be on the law alone.  The statement is striking and perhaps somewhat puzzling.  It is clearly a statement of the permanence of the law. The preservation of every least mark of the pen is a vivid way to convey that no part of it can be dispensed with.  But the saying is complicated by two “until” clauses. It is not clear how these two clauses relate to one another, or whether they are making the same or different points. “Until heaven and earth pass away” is the equivalent of our modern “until hell freezes over” – a colloquial way of saying “never.” The phrase about “heaven and earth” appears as a positive in Jeremiah (cf. Jer 31:35-36; 33:20-21, 25-26) and Job 14:12. The expression is also used positively in Ps 72:5, 7, 17. The repetition of the verb “pass away” (parerchomai) links the law to the earth/heavens as equally permanent. Note that in Mt 24:35 Jesus’ own words are stated to be more permanent than heaven and earth.

The puzzling part comes with the use of the second “until.”  Some see the repetition as just that, a repetition for emphasis.  But the second “until” is contextualized by something happening, whereas the first is in the context of something that will not happen.  The majority of scholars see the phrase “until all things have taken place” as typical Matthean use of eschatological fulfillment (as he does later in 24:34). If this is correct then fulfilling the law and the prophets is in terms of a future situation to which the law pointed. Then the text could be saying that the smallest detail of the law would be valid until the fulfillment arrived – and only valid until then.

This is the point at which some insist that Jesus is that fulfillment and since Jesus is there in their midst, then the law passes away. But in the light of Jesus claiming not to abolish the law (v.17), his insistence that even the least of the commandments remains important (v.18) and that the community is to “obey and teach these commandments” (v.19) – that understanding seems improbable. 

The double “until” is perhaps awkward but is paraphrased by RT France (2007, p.186) as: “The law, down to its smallest details, is as permanent as heaven and earth, and will never lose its significance; on the contrary, all that it points forward to will in fact become a reality.”  The new reality is present in Jesus, but not fully present as the kingdom of heaven. Still the law (smallest detail and all) have to be seen in a new light, but they still cannot be discarded.  Matthew will make clear in 5:21-47 how the law will function in a new situation where they are not halakah but are pointers to a greater righteousness (relationship) in the family kinship (covenant).


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain 

The Role of Jesus and the Law…. and the Prophets

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.” (Mt 5:17)

The opening passage of this Gospel is controversial.  Is it a general statement of Jesus’ attitude to the Old Testament? Especially in its legal provisions, is it designed to introduce the detailed examples of Jesus’ teaching in relation to the Old Testament law in vv. 21–48 and other points throughout the Gospel? Do Jesus’ words affirm the permanent validity of the details of the Old Testament law as regulations, or do they express more generally the God-given authority of the Old Testament without specifying just how it is applicable in the new situation introduced by the coming of Jesus? 

Too often the question becomes framed only with respect to the “Law” where the verse reads: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill” (5:17).  The “law or the prophets” establishes a literary bracket with 7:12 (Do to others whatever you would have them do to you.This is the law and the prophets.”), setting off the verses/sections in between as the instructional core of the Sermon. The phrase itself technically refers to the Pentateuch, the Former Prophets (Joshua-Kings) and Latter Prophets (Isaiah-Malachi), but forms the functional equivalent of the whole of Scripture.

Remember that this is not an apologetic to those who had accused 1st-century Christians of rejecting the Law (or rather the rabbinic interpretation of the Law), but rather is for “internal use” by Christians who belong to a community that has made some fundamental changes to Torah observance (which is different that rejecting the Law).  Jesus does not abolish the law, yet he does not affirm the status quo of the manner of observance. How are we to understand this “in-between” posture?  Eugene Boring (186-87) offers some clear insights as he writes:

“(1) The whole Scripture (‘law and prophets’) testifies to God’s will and work in history. Matthew does not retreat from this affirmation. He does not play off the (abiding) ‘moral law’ against the (temporary) ‘ceremonial law.’

“(2) God’s work, testified to in the Scriptures, is not yet complete. The Law and Prophets point beyond themselves to the definitive act of God in the eschatological, messianic future.’

“(3) The advent of the messianic king’s proclaiming and representing the eschatological kingdom of God is the fulfillment of the Scriptures – the Law and Prophets. The Messiah has come. He embodies and teaches the definitive will of God. The Law and Prophets are to be obeyed not for what they are in themselves, but because they mediate the will of God. But in Matthew, Jesus declares that what he teaches is God’s will and the criterion of eschatological judgment (7:24, 26; cf. 7:21), so there can be no conflict between Jesus and the Torah, which he fulfills. This is a tremendous, albeit implicit, christological claim.

“(4) The messianic fulfillment does not nullify or make obsolete the Law and the Prophets, but confirms them. The incorporation of the Law in the more comprehensive history of salvation centered is the Christ-event which is an affirmation of the Law, not its rejection.

“(5) But his affirmation, by being fulfilled by Christ, does not always mean a mere repetition or continuation of the original Law. Fulfillment may mean transcendence as well (cf. 12:1-14). The Matthean Jesus elsewhere enunciates the critical principle that mercy, justice, love, and covenant loyalty are the weightier matters of the Law by which the rest of must be judged (see 9:13; 12:7, both of which quote that his own life and teaching are the definite revelation of the will of God; cf. 11:25-27; 28:12-20) does indeed mean that neither the written Torah nor its interpretation in the oral tradition…is the final authority.”

At this point one needs to be careful lest one is drawn into a purely “Law” question and begins to focus on the legal portion of the Mosaic covenant to the exclusion of the remainder of that covenant, as well as the other covenants that make up the whole of the relationship of the people with God. Remember that this passage follows upon an earlier passage wherein Jesus is teaching the disciples about discipleship in the kingdom of heaven (5:1-2) – something that is here and yet not fully here.


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

The Language of the Sermon

Here on the 6th Sunday of Ordinary Time, our gospel reading continues the “Sermon on the Mount” begun on the 4th Sunday.  As mentioned elsewhere, the “Sermon” is the first of the Matthean discourses and perhaps the best known. Warren Carter (Matthew and the Margins) has these introductory comments about the entire sermon:

The focus of Jesus’ teaching concerns the “good news of God’s empire/reign” (4:17, 23; 5:3, 10, 19, 20; 6:10, 33; 7:21). The sermon is not, though, a comprehensive manual or rule book, not a step-by-step “how to” book. Rather it offers a series of illustrations, or “for examples,” or “case studies” of life in God’s empire, visions of the identity and way of life that result from encountering God’s present and future reign. (p.128)

For those who belong to the minority and marginal community of disciples of Jesus, the sermon continues the gospel’s formational and envisioning work. It shapes and strengthens the community’s identity and lifestyle as a small community in a dominant culture that does not share that culture’s fundamental convictions. The community is reminded that the interactions with God, with one another, and with the surrounding society are important aspects of their existence which embraces all of life, present and future. Mission to, love for, and tension with the surrounding society mark their participation in this society. Integrity or wholeness defines their relationships with one another. Prayer, accountability, and the active doing of God’s will are features of their relationship with God and experience of God’s empire. (p.129)

Carter’s insights about the “relationship” language and images present in the Sermon are so far present in the Beatitudes (5:1-12) and metaphors of salt and light (5:14-16) – in describing not the “terms and conditions” of the relationship with God and God’s people, or a halakah (rule of life) – but rather is meant to stimulate the imagination and personal responsibility of freely entering into the covenant relationship with God.  But it also leaves the listener to wonder what exactly is meant by “covenant.” In modern language use in English, the term is often thought of in the same light as “contract.” Carter’s insight is that covenant can only be fully expressed when one considers the implied relationships, and thus one is led to ask, “What does it mean to truly be God’s people?”

Continue reading

The Patristic Tradition of Salt and Light

Here is a sampling of early Church leaders and their thoughts on the salt and light metaphors used in Matthew’ gospel.

St. John Chrysostom (4th century): “For what is salt? It renders food useful and even indispensable. So too, the disciples by their doctrine hinder the whole world from decay. And what is light? It shines forth and discloses what was hidden in darkness. Thus they are both the salt that prevents corruption and the light that enlightens the mind… For the presence of those who live in virtue both stops the corruption of others and guides them to the truth.” (Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 15.6–7)

St. Augustine of Hippo (4th–5th century): “The Lord said to His disciples: You are the salt of the earth; you are the light of the world. In these two names He wished to show what His disciples would accomplish: by the one, corruption is kept from the world; by the other, the darkness of ignorance is driven away. So let the Christian be salt by his conduct and light by his teaching and praise of God.” (Sermon 53.6)

St. Hilary of Poitiers (4th century): “To be called the salt of the earth and the light of the world is the charge of a life both pure and manifest. Salt preserves righteousness; light manifests the works of God. He who is salt must also be light, so that both the corruption of sin is restrained and the brightness of faith is shown.” (Commentary on Matthew 4.10–11)

4. St. Jerome (4th–5th century): “The apostles are the salt of the earth in the teaching of the gospel, lest the hearts of believers grow corrupt. They are the light of the world because their works shine and show to all the truth of their preaching. Salt without light is hidden; light without salt lacks strength.” (Commentary on Matthew 5:13–16)

 St. Gregory of Nyssa (4th century): “The Lord calls His disciples salt and light: salt because they cleanse the uncleanness of life; light because they reveal to the world the way of salvation. But these are not two works but the same grace: for the soul purified by virtue will also shine with the radiance of truth.” (Homilies on the Beatitudes, Homily 5)

St. Bede the Venerable (8th century): “The Lord made His disciples to be at once salt and light. Salt, that they might season hearts grown tasteless in folly; light, that by their example they might shine before all. For the seasoning of doctrine and the brightness of holiness must go together in the teacher of Christ.” (Homilies on the Gospels I.14)

Across the Fathers, a clear pattern emerges: salt refers to moral integrity, purity, preservation of righteousness, and the inward force of holiness. Light refers to teaching, public witness, visible example, and illumination of truth. Both together express the fullness of Christian discipleship: a holy life (salt) that gives public witness (light).


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

Salt and Light Together

“You are the light of the world. A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden.  Nor do they light a lamp and then put it under a bushel basket; it is set on a lampstand, where it gives light to all in the house. Just so, your light must shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your heavenly Father.” (Mt 5:14-16)

“Salt” and “Light” are overlapping images. Both metaphors stand or fall together as they emphasize

  • identity: not merely what disciples do, but what they are
  • mission: disciples exist for the sake of the world
  • distinctiveness: disciples must be different from the world
  • effect: disciples are meant to transform their environment

A disciple who is not “salty” cannot shine; a disciple who does not shine has no salt. 

Yet they are different. Salt works quietly; light works visibly. Salt transforms from within, preserving what would decay, purifying what is corrupt, and giving flavor to what is bland. It works silently and imperceptibly, yet powerfully. Light is public, visible, and unmistakable. Light transforms from without, revealing what is hidden, guiding those in darkness, and manifesting truth. Salt is a subtle influence; light is a visible witness.

Salt is the depth of discipleship; light is its expression. A disciple must be transformed (salt) before he or she can transform others (light). Salt without light risks being hidden holiness and missing the opportunities to evangelize. Light without salt risks being hollow activism. A person might appear active but lack interior holiness.

Salt and Light together form a balanced identity: a holiness that shines and a witness rooted in integrity. Together they can take the mission of the Church to the ends of the earth.


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

Light of the World 

“You are the light of the world. A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden.  Nor do they light a lamp and then put it under a bushel basket; it is set on a lampstand, where it gives light to all in the house. Just so, your light must shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your heavenly Father.” (Mt 5:14-16)

In Scripture, light symbolizes God’s presence (Ex 13:21; Ps 27:1), God’s wisdom and law (Ps 119:105), revelation of truth, joy and salvation, and the mission of Israel (Isa 42:6; 49:6). In the Gospel of John, Jesus is explicitly called “the light of the world” (John 8:12). Matthew applies that same imagery to Jesus’ disciples. That alone is a striking theological claim.

Matthew highlights that the light of the disciples is derived, not inherent. They share in the Light of Christ. Since Jesus proclaims Himself the true light (cf. John), the Church becomes the reflection of Christ’s light, a visible continuation of His mission, and a community whose holiness reveals the presence of Christ. This interpretation connects closely to the idea of the Church as the body of Christ (cf. 1 Cor 12).

Continue reading

Salt of the Earth

This coming Sunday is the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year A. Our very short gospel passage includes the well known verse:“You are the salt of the earth.” (Mt 5:13) Why Salt? In the first century, salt was much more than a seasoning. It symbolized preservation (for meat and fish), purification – salt was added to sacrifices (Lev 2:13); Covenant fidelity (cf. Lev 2:13: “you shall not let the salt of the covenant… be lacking”, Num 18:19; Ezra 4:14); Wisdom in Jewish literature (m. Sotah 9:15) as well as Greco-Roman literature; and, value as salt was sometimes used as a form of payment. Jesus’ metaphor would have carried all these resonances for His listeners as the description of the role of a disciple is teased out.

The symbol of salt as a preservative point to the role given to all disciples to prevent moral decay within the community. Many Church Fathers and modern commentators see salt as that which keeps the world from corruption. St. John Chrysostom wrote that Christ’s disciples preserve the world from “rotting in sin” by their teaching, holiness, and example. Thus, Christians living the Beatitudes that precede this verse, are the moral and spiritual agents that keep humanity from sliding into corruption. If they lose their distinctiveness, the world suffers.

Pointing to the role salt has in flavoring food is to be understood as the task to bring out the “flavor” of God’s kingdom by their joy and authenticity giving others a “taste” of God. Christians witness to God’s kingdom by: living the Beatitudes; embodying mercy, justice, and purity of heart; and revealing the joy and freedom of life with God. The idea is that Christian life should make God desirable not bland or burdensome.

As a covenant symbol disciples make God’s covenant present. “All your grain offerings you shall season with salt. Do not let the salt of the covenant… be lacking.” (Leviticus 2:13) In this light Jesus’ followers are the living sign of God’s covenant—a holy people whose presence points to God’s fidelity and holiness, keystones of what it means to be the people of God.

Salt was used medically and ritually. Elisha purified water with salt (2 Kings 2:19–22). Thus, disciples are to be agents of healing, instruments of reconciliation, and purifiers of the “bitter waters of the world” through mercy and truth.

​​In both Jewish and Hellenistic literature, “salt” could symbolize wisdom. St Paul makes the connection explicitly: “Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt…” (Col 4:6) Writ largers, the Sermon on the Mount itself embodies divine wisdom; disciples who internalize it become a source of true wisdom in society.

St. Augustine held salt to symbolize wisdom and also the sharpness of correction in that disciples teach the world and correct it with the truth. St. Jerome viewed salt as tied to righteousness: “We season the world with the justice of God.” St. Bede understood salt to represent the apostles’ doctrine, preserving the Church from error.

The Catechism echoes these themes: Christians, united to Christ, have a mission to transform the world and witness to the kingdom (cf. CCC 782, 2044–2046). Most Catholic commentators emphasize

  • distinctiveness: disciples must stand apart by holiness,
  • mission: the Church’s presence prevents moral decay and nurtures life, and
  • witness: the life of the gospel gives “flavor” to the world.

But if salt loses its taste, with what can it be seasoned? It is no longer good for anything but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. (Mt 5:13). This is a warning to the disciples

Disciples, if they are true to their calling, make the earth a purer and a more palatable place. But they can do so only as long as they preserve their distinctive character: unsalty salt has no more value. Strictly, pure salt cannot lose its salinity; but the impure ‘salt’ dug from the shores of the Dead Sea could gradually become unsalty as the actual sodium chloride dissolved. In any case, Jesus was not teaching chemistry, but using a proverbial image (it recurs in Bekhoroth 8b). The Rabbis commonly used salt as an image for wisdom (cf. Col. 4:6), which may explain why the Greek word represented by lost its taste actually means ‘become foolish’. (Aramaic tāpēl, which conveys both meanings, was no doubt the word used by Jesus.) A foolish disciple has no influence on the world.

Thus the warning: if disciples compromise the gospel, dilute the faith, or cease living the Beatitudes, they lose their effectiveness. This is just one of Matthew’s Gospel warnings about the danger of discipleship without authenticity.


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

The 9th Beatitude

This coming Sunday is the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year A. Our very short gospel passage (salt of the earth and light of the world) follows immediately after Matthew’s presentation of the Beatitudes. Verses 11-12 (not part of the Sunday gospel) are often called the 9th beatitude because of the opening phrase. But where vv.3-10 describes the good life, these verses bring it into contrast and begin to describe the cost (v.11) and remind the listener that you are simply joining a long tradition. The prophets who earlier proclaimed the kingdom and its demands were also persecuted.

Just as the prophets stood out and apart from “business as usual,” so too will the disciples who have committed themselves to Jesus. Here and in the next few verses the “you” that appears is always plural. The concern here is that the Christian community stand out, appear different, and become an alternative to the larger society. In Matthew’s account, the famous tune, “This Little Light of Mine” would read “This Little Light of Ours.” The community of disciples are called to be collective light and salt.

The salt/light metaphors (and possibly ‘city on the hill’) are only effective signs of the Kingdom to the extent with which the community is willing to use them, to bring them to bear. Salt, no matter how pure and tasty, if left in the cellar is not much use. A light locked away inside, will not illuminate anything in the world. In part, a goal of discipleship is to be noticed, to stand out, to be more than a curiosity, to be significant; in other words, to be distinctive and to be involved. The dangers of being a community too comfortable, too scared, or too closed off is seen in the Book of Revelation’s letter to the community of Laodicea: “To the angel of the church in Laodicea, write this: ‘The Amen, the faithful and true witness, the source of God’s creation, says this: “I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either cold or hot. So, because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.”’”  (Rev 3:14-16)


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

What Follows

This coming Sunday is the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year A. Our very short gospel passage (salt of the earth and light of the world) follows immediately after Matthew’s presentation of the Beatitudes (5:1-10) as part of the larger “Sermon on the Mount” as it is popularly known. It is a parallel text, in part, to Luke 6:20-49, the “Sermon on the Plain.” More importantly, this passage is part of the first of the five great discourses in the gospel. At a broad stroke, Matthew 5-7 are an expose of Jesus’ authoritative teaching; Chapters 8-9 are pericopes of his authoritative deeds.

With the chapters dealing with authoritative teaching, there are four primary themes that emerge (R.T. France, The Gospel of Matthew): 

5:3-16 distinctiveness of Christian discipleship
5:17-48 disciples: fulfilling the Law
6:1-18 disciples: true and false piety
6:19-34 disciples: trust in God over material security

The majority of Chapter 7 is given to providing contrasting examples of these, with the culmination in Matthew 7:28-29: “When Jesus finished these words, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he taught them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.

Although crowds are described at the beginning of Mt 5, the focus of this larger discourse is for the disciples who have already responded to Jesus (cf. 4:18-22) and now need to learn what life in the Kingdom really means. To understand the “Sermon on the Mount” as simply a general code of ethics, is to miss that Jesus is beginning to explicate the demands of the Kingdom that point towards a way of being in the world: “So be perfect, just as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Mt 5:48)  This is held in contradistinction from a simplistic following of the Law (5:21-48).

One of the points, lost in translation, is that the meaning of “Blessed are….” in the Beatitudes are a bit more subtle than would appear at first glance. The Greek word used in makarios.  This does not mean “blessed by God” (bārûk in Hebrews, translated into Greek as eulogētos). The word “happy” in today’s English carries too much connotation of emotional and psychological well-being – and that is off the mark. The word “fortunate” gets closer, while some scholars the most idiomatic English expression which captures the sense in the Australian “good on yer.”  Makarios is a description of the circumstances of a good life; a life well lived – even if it proves to come at a cost.


Image credit: Sermon on the Mount (1877) by Carl Heinrich Bloch | Museum of National History | Frederiksborg Castle, Public Domain

Relationship of The Two Stanzas of the Beatitudes

The people described in the first stanza are those who lack dikaiosynē. The people described in the second stanza are those dedicated to bringing dikaiosynē. Thus the people in the second part provide what the people are lacking in the first part. Ironically, by seeking to provide dikaiosynē, the virtuous may find themselves in the position of lacking dikaiosynē. With Jesus as an example: he proclaimed justice to those deprived of justice, and he became one who was unjustly executed.

Whether the coming of God’s kingdom is perceived as bringing reversal or reward depends only on the position that one occupies prior to its advent. God’s rule sets things right. Those for whom things have not been right are blessed by the changes it brings and those who have been seeking to set things right are blessed by the accomplishment of what they have sought. (Powell, 138).

The Final Blessing

11 Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of evil against you (falsely) because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward will be great in heaven.

The sudden shift to “you” must have been shocking to the disciples and other followers. Up until now in the gospel, the disciples have neither been the unfortunate in need of the eschatological reversal nor the virtuous waiting for the eschatological reward. They just followed Jesus, but sort of standing on the sidelines, watching the activities; listening to Jesus. They have been hearing about those other poor and virtuous souls and the blessings pronounced on them. Suddenly the word you involves the hearers. Suddenly Jesus’ words aren’t about those other people any more but me. Why would we be reviled and persecuted and lied about? Because you are committed to dikaiosynēand because of this commitment, you will end up in the position of those lacking dikaiosynē – being unjustly persecuted. However, we have already heard the blessings God has in store for such people. Will we believe those promises for ourselves or not? Will we believe that God will make all things right for us – whether reversal or rewards? If so, we can rejoice and be glad, knowing we have a great reward in heaven.


Image credit: Cosimo Rosselli Sermone della Montagna, 1481, Sistine Chapel, Public Domain