Repentance and Its Fruit

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C. The previous post looked at the parable of the fig tree in the orchard in detail.  The parable highlighted Jesus’ teaching on the need for repentance that has been indicated throughout the section 12:1-13:9. A clear message of the teaching and the parable is that such repentance has its fruits as well as fruits we are expected to bear into the world.

  • Fear not of the one who can harm us in life, but righteous fear of the One who can cast into hell (12:5). 
  • Consider ourselves valuable because we are the ones in Creation that God sees as “very good” (v. 7) 
  • Acknowledge Christ as Savior before others (v. 8) 
  • Be on guard against greed (v. 15) 
  • Be rich towards God (v. 21) 
  • Don’t worry about your life (v. 22) 
  • Strive for the kingdom (v. 31) 
  • Sell possessions and give alms (v. 33) 
  • Be ready for the Son of Man’s return (vv. 35-40) 
  • Be doing what the master wants (v. 47) 
  • Interpret the present time (v. 56) 
Continue reading

A Fig Tree in the Orchard: a parable

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C. In the previous post we considered the meaning of “repentance” in the light of Jesus’ admonition that we do not know the time of the end of our days, but the day will come and so we are to repent of sin and seek righteousness before God.

6 And he told them this parable: “There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, 7 he said to the gardener, ‘For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. (So) cut it down. Why should it exhaust the soil?’ 8 He said to him in reply, ‘Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; 9 it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down.’” 

Continue reading

Repentance

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C. In the previous post we explored how Jesus responded to the people in their conversation about the tragedies that were “in the news.” One tragedy was intentional, a brutal event instigated by the Roman rulers; the other was an accident. Jesus’ response is that neither are indications of divine judgment against sinners. Rather, in view of the uncertainty of life and the unpredictability of the future one must be warned to examine one’s own life and repent.

In our passage, the verb “to repent” (metanoeo) is in the present tense (subjunctive), which implies continuous action = “be repentant” or “continue to repent” or “keep on repenting.” In other words, this does not speak to a once-for-all-time event that saves one from “perishing,” but rather a lifestyle of penitence.

Continue reading

The Folly of Empty Worship

Today’s gospel (Matthew 23:1-12) seems pretty clear in its intention: the burdens laid upon the people by the Pharisees and their scribes are not pleasing to the Lord. The burdens include the Pharisaic interpretations of the Law (You have heard it said….but I say to you) as well as the overly ritualized forms of temple/cultic worship. In many ways it is the same message Isaiah had for the people of his time, our first reading (Isaiah 1:10, 16-20).

Continue reading

Why do bad things happen?

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C. In the previous post we considered the series of admonitions and warnings that Jesus offered to the disciples, highlighting that whatever the cauldron of life brings their way, never doubt the providential care of God. And so don’t be consumed by worrying about earthly concerns, but bear fruit in what matters to God.

At the start of the gospel narrative, people bring Jesus an account of Pilate’s horrific actions among the Galileans. The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus describes Pontius Pilate in two key passages in his work Antiquities of the Jews (written around 93–94 AD). His depiction presents Pilate as a harsh and insensitive ruler, often clashing with Jewish customs and provoking unrest. Josephus recounts how Pilate offended Jewish religious sensitivities by bringing Roman military standards bearing the emperor’s image into Jerusalem. This was seen as idolatrous by the Jewish people, who protested intensely. Eventually, Pilate was forced to remove the standards to avoid a larger uprising. Later, when Pilate sought to fund a new aqueduct in Jerusalem using money from the Temple treasury the Jewish populace protested. Pilate responded by sending disguised soldiers into the crowd, who violently suppressed the demonstrators, leading to many deaths.

Continue reading

Admonitions

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C.  For parishes with active RCIA programs it is also the beginning of the Lenten Scrutinies when the catechumens/elect (those awaiting baptism) are present at Mass. The presider has the option to use the readings from Year A. So, if this Sunday you are wondering why the Johannine gospel of Jesus’ encounter with a Samaritan woman at the well is proclaimed, you’ll know why! In this post we will stay with the Year C readings.

Coming as it does on this Sunday in Lent, out of sequence with the narrative flow of Luke’s gospel, we would do well to consider the verses that precede our gospel pericope.

Continue reading

A Reflection and Final Thought

Annemarie Reiner (of Adelaide, Australia) posted this reflection on the Transfiguration on her blog “Who Do You Say That I Am.”  It is a very nice reflection to consider in this Lenten Season.

When we look at our Gospel today we can understand why daily reflection is so important. These three disciples (and the rest of them) didn’t get who Jesus was until well after his death. They didn’t understand what had happened at the transfiguration. They didn’t understand what was happening as they witnessed Jesus’ life. They didn’t understand what was happening at the crucifixion. But they kept pondering their experiences over and over – if they didn’t we simply wouldn’t have the New Testament.

So what do we learn from this?

Continue reading

Grace, Conversion and Anger

It is quite usual to hear someone confess the sin of anger. After all anger (or wrath) is one of the seven deadly sins. I might ask the person if they think their anger was justified and impacted a righteous cause. For example, someone cuts you off in traffic in a dangerous way, you are instantly upset, perhaps even angry, but you take a deep breath and move on with your day. Was that a sin? It was certainly a temptation to sin, but that temptation came along wrapped in grace.  On that day you chose grace and let the anger pass. This leads me to think about grace, temptation, sin and what Jesus is trying to convey in today’s gospel where murder and calling someone a fool end up in the same verse.

Continue reading

A moment in Time

The ideas are taken from a reflection in Culpepper’s treatment of The Transfiguration in the Gospel of Luke [The Gospel of Luke, 207-208]. He makes the point that over the course of the history of Christianity, mystics and saints have lived lives of disciplined piety in hopes of experiencing such a beatific vision of Jesus such as the three apostles experienced on the mountain top. But many of us have had moments we are unable to explain when we felt the presence of God, not on the mountain top, but in the ordinary of the day. Or perhaps in an extraordinary moment of life – a retreat, a graveside – moments when the nature of God is somehow just a little more clear even as it remains transcendent.

Continue reading

Peter’s Response

This coming Sunday the gospel reading is Luke’s version of the Transfiguration of Jesus. 

32 Peter and his companions had been overcome by sleep, but becoming fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men standing with him. 33 As they were about to part from him, Peter said to Jesus, “Master, it is good that we are here; let us make three tents, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.” But he did not know what he was saying. 

As before, Peter again responds, again without a full understanding.  Consider Peter’s proposal to make three tents (skēnḗ; also “booth” or “tabernacle”). What did he intend? It has been variously understood as traveler’s hut, the “tent of meeting” where God spoke with Moses outside the camp (Exod 33:7), a more formal tent used in the Festival of Booths (cf. Lev 23:42–43; Zech 14:16ff), and even as the Jerusalem Temple tabernacle.  It is this last image that Luke may have in mind as background – notwithstanding Peter’s intention.  It is the Temple tabernacle where the Shekinah, the fiery cloud that symbolized the continuing presence of God among the people, dwelt over the ark of the covenant.  The response to Peter’s proposal is three-fold (Boring, 364)

Continue reading