The Departure of the Younger Son

The parable begins with the younger son asking for what he considers his share of the inheritance – something that is for the father to decide. In the asking, the son communicates that he does not view the inheritance as a gift given because of his father’s good graces; rather he sees it as his due.

Kenneth Bailey, a NT scholar who lived for years in the Middle East, asked many people in the Near East cultures how one is to understand the younger son’s request.  The answer is consistent and harsh: the son would rather have his father dead so as to gain the inheritance. In an honor/shame society it would be appropriate to ask, “What father having been asked by a son to give him inheritance…” Again the Lucan answer is not the answer of the society. The father grants the request. Where the younger son asks for “the share of your estate (ousia) that should come to me.” Luke tells us that the father “divided between them his property (bios, literally “life”).” 

Imagination can fill in the familiar story line that is compressed with great economy: the extravagant spending, the attraction of freeloading friends, the crash. It should be noted that the young man squandered (diaskorpizo) the money. This does not imply a use for immoral reasons (which the brother suggests in v.30), but rather a thoughtless use of the funds.  In any case, he becomes penniless and is reduced to tending swine for the Gentiles.  For the Hebrew, caring for pigs evoked the idea of apostasy and the loss of everything that once identified the younger son as a member of his family and of God’s people. He is even lower than the swine — they have access to the husks, but he does not. It is a story of downward mobility

Court Watching

On March 31, the US Supreme Court will hear argument in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission. The branch of Catholic Charities involved in this case provides housing and job training to disabled and elderly persons in the Wisconsin Diocese of Superior

The origins of the case go back to 2016 when the Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission ruled that the Catholic Charities is ineligible for an unemployment tax exemption. The state permits exemptions for organizations “operated primarily for religious purposes,” yet the Commission ultimately determined that the charitable works of Catholic Charities serves no “religious purpose” when it ministers to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm. The Commission ruled that Catholic Charities’ work is secular (and thus, non-exempt) because its activities resemble those of secular charities.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court acknowledged that the work was rooted in religious motivations, but that since the work lacked any recognizable religious activities such as worship, ritual, teaching the faith, or spreading a religious message. Hmmmm?

We don’t help others because they are Catholic. We help because we are Catholic.

Musing and Meaning

Today’s gospel is a familiar part of the Christmas story – the Angel Gabriel inviting Mary into the plans of God for redemption and salvation of the world. I suspect we quickly want to jump the 9 months and have our thoughts move quickly to the Nativity of Jesus. But let us put things on “pause” for a moment and remember we are in the midst of Lent and in that vein let us reconsider this well-known story for this liturgical season. 

The Annunciation is deeply part of the Church’s tradition of religious art. The scene of the Angel Gabriel and Mary has been interpreted by many great artists: Da Vinci, Rembrandt, El Greco and countless other artists and iconographers over the ages.

Continue reading

Inheritance

The parable, the longest in the Gospels, consists of three main parts: (1) the departure of the younger son to a distant land where he squanders his inheritance (vv.11-19), (2) the homecoming of the son and welcome by his father (vv.20-24), and (3) the episode between the father and the older son who stayed at home (vv.25-32).  How this parable differs is that what is lost is a human person – one who has existing human relationships with his father and his brother.  The younger son’s metanioa is not simply a change of his mind in absence of these relationships. Repentance necessarily involves those relationships. 

Continue reading

In All Circumstances

In the first reading, we hear the end of the story of Naaman, a Syrian general, who has just been cured of his leprosy. When Naaman comes to Israel he encounters the prophet Elisha. Naaman has come bearing all manner of riches and gifts, but Elisha wants none of it. He simply instructs Naaman to wash seven times in the Jordan River. Pretty simple and ordinary, yes?

Lots of ways that Naaman could react. Scripture tells us he is not pleased. In effect he responds, “Are you kidding me? This nasty little river? I have great rivers in Damascus. Couldn’t I have washed there? And, aren’t you supposed to put on a big show? This was a serious waste of time.” And at that he turns to leave and go home.

Continue reading

Focus?

Where is the focus of the story? Is it the younger of the two sons? Afterall the parable is known as the prodigal son (by the way “prodigal” means wasteful.) Perhaps the focus should be on the father? Or perhaps it is a family story given the opening verse of the parable is: “A man had two sons.” (v.11). Again, Joel Green [578] offers valuable insight:

“Whose parable is it? The traditional answer, that it concerns a father with two sons, has much to commend it. Most importantly, the parable begins by naming ‘a man (who had two sons),’ and goes on to underscore his conciliatory responses to the insulting behavior of both sons. Three telling observations suggest that this is not the case, however. First, the narrative has two primary segments, each allowing the same story to be recounted—fully by Jesus (vv 11–24), then in summary fashion by ‘one of the slaves’ (vv 26–27). In the first, the emphasis falls on the younger son’s ‘loss’ and his father’s celebrative response to his return, while in the latter the emphasis falls on the younger son’s loss and his brother’s indignant reaction to his return.

Continue reading

Lost, Found, Joy and Family

The parable of the “Prodigal Son” does not stand alone. It is framed by the opening verses of the chapter and the parables which come before. One must always keep in mind that the three parables (Lost Sheep, Lost Coin, and the Prodigal Son) are told in response to the complaint that Jesus welcomes and eats with “tax collectors and sinners.” The former being traitors to their religious family and the latter already standing condemned by the Laws of the family. They are people “outside the camp” – they are lost.

In the first parable when the lost sheep is found the shepherd invites others to “Rejoice with me.” (Lk 15:6). Jesus notes that there is “joy in heaven” (v.7) because – not that one was found – but that the lost one repented. In the second parable the woman invites others to rejoice with her because she has found the lost coin. Again, Jesus notes “there will be rejoicing among the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” (v.10) Again the focus is on repentance.

What is different about the third parable is that the dynamic is no longer property, but family.

Continue reading

Asking “why”

Maybe we should call this “Second Chance Sunday.” The first reading is the well-known story of Moses and the burning bush. But one needs to remember the reason Moses is out tending sheep in the desert of Midian is that he murdered a man back in Egypt and is on-the-run from the authorities. Yet God will give him a second chance and a major role in rescuing the Israelites from slavery. That’s a heck of a second chance. He takes advantage of it. Moses is leading a flock of sheep now, but will soon be leading the people of God in their Exodus to the promised land. Continue reading

STAT

If you have ever watched a movie or television series with hospital emergency room scenes, you have undoubtedly heard a medical professional say that they need something “Stat.” The context alone lets you know that the meaning is “immediately.” Did you ever wonder why “Stat” means “immediately?”

If the word was “stats” at least we know it is simply a shortened version of “statistics.” But the origin of “stat” as “immediately” is an abbreviation for the Latin word statim, also meaning “immediately.” Ok…. but why did the medical profession pick up the word for use? When stat first entered the English lexicon in the early 19th century, it was used by physicians clarifying that a drug or procedure should be administered immediately – with Latin being a source of words that could move across language barriers.

“Stat” is used today, sometimes to differentiate a medication that must be administered immediately from two other types of medication orders that are to be given immediately. What about if the medication is to be given as needed? Thank you, Latin for for pro re nata (literally, “for the affair born”), meaning “as needed.”

So, here’s hoping you read my blog pro re nata – or stat when a new one is published!

Faithful or Fruitful? Myths and Final Thoughts

This coming Sunday is the 3rd Sunday in Lent, Year C. All week long we have considered the need for repentance and what follows: the fruit of repentance. Based on Luke 12:1-13:9, the “fruit” might be summarized as referring to our relationship with God, our relationship with self (especially concerning money), and our relationship with others. And clearly in our passage there is a very strong accent on “repentance.” But what is it that we expect regarding our Christian “fruitfulness.”  In his book Purpose Driven Church, Pastor Rick Warren has a section dealing with “Myth #7: All God Expects of Us Is Faithfulness.” His answer to the meaning of fruitfulness is provocative and challenging:

Continue reading