How far

It has been my experience that people just beginning serious study of Sacred Scriptures follow a pattern: the Gospels/Acts, selected Old Testament books, and then the letters of St. Paul. One of the challenges in reading and understanding Paul is that you are often only listening to half of the conversation. Often Paul is responding to some news or correspondence he has received from the particular Christian community, e.g. Corinth and Galatia. This week’s first readings are mostly taken from the Letter to the Ephesians, a letter that lacks any personal greetings and seems, as some scholars offer, a “circular letter” meant to be received, copied and passed on to the next community. One is left to wonder if Paul is writing about a problem or whether the majestic chapters of Ephesians are meant to be an overarching message that emphasizes the unity in the church of Christ that has come about for both Jews and Gentiles within God’s household.

In the first reading today, Paul talks about “the mystery was made known to me by revelation.” He tells us the great mystery: the Gentiles would share in God’s promises. But wait a minute. Didn’t Isaiah already say that the nations would come to worship God? Didn’t God promise Abraham that all the families of the earth would be blessed through him? So what exactly was the mystery?

The surprise wasn’t simply that the Gentiles were invited but that they were no longer outsiders. “The Gentiles are coheirs [synklēronoma], members of the same Body [syssōma], and co-partners [symmetocha] in the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.”  The underlying Greek and its near alliteration drives the point home. They didn’t have to become someone else before they could belong to Christ. The middle word, syssōma, is especially striking. It is an unusual Greek formation, emphasizing membership in the very same body, not simply association between two communities. The emphasis isn’t merely that Gentiles may receive blessings from Israel’s God. They become equal participants in God’s promise through Christ.

Prophetic expectation was that the nations would come to Zion and worship Israel’s God. But the mystery revealed in Christ is that Jews and Gentiles are reconciled in Christ and together constitute one new humanity, sharing the same access to the Father through the Spirit. The prophets saw the nations coming to God. But they did not see the full shape of the Church as the one Body of Christ, constituted through his death and resurrection, in which Gentiles share fully in the promise without becoming Jews. All this is no longer some future event, but one that has already happened. The Church itself has become the visible expression of what God has accomplished. “So that the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known through the church to the principalities and authorities in the heavens.”

If God’s great mystery is that people once separated have become one in Christ, then the Church cannot proclaim that mystery while casually accepting divisions within its own life. We cannot celebrate being one Body while treating other members as though they don’t belong. And the challenge isn’t simply to be welcoming in a general sense. It is to recognize that the person whom I might regard as an outsider may already be someone Christ has made my brother or sister.

For generations, the prophets proclaimed that the nations would come to God. But in Christ, God did something more extraordinary than anyone had fully imagined. He didn’t simply invite the nations to come and visit. He made them family.

It is not that God had never hinted at what He intended to do, but that no one had yet seen just how far God’s promise would go.

And you have to wonder if God is done. How far might He go?


Image credit: “Christ at the home of Martha and Mary” | Charles de La Fosse | Private collection in a castle in Lorraine (France); Galerie Didier Chéreau, Paris | PD-US

What’s love got to do with it?

This coming Sunday is the 30th Sunday in Ordinary Time. In commentaries and in Bible studies, I often encounter the variety of words, in the Greek, used for love. People ask lots of questions about the meaning and use of them in Scripture. There are perhaps several questions that can be asked:

  1. How do modern-day Christians use and interpret the various Greek words for “love”: eros, philos, and agape? The answer is often given as a hierarchy of love ascending to God-love in the word agape.
  2. How did the first century Scripture writers understand the differing words? How did they intend to use them?
  3. How does OT and NT scriptures use the words.

It is perhaps the latter question that is the foundation. Boring (425) provides an excellent summary:

The word used here for “love” is ἀγαπάω (agapaō), the verbal form of ἀγάπη (agapē). The interpreter should first dispel the tradition that has become almost sacrosanct that there is some magic in the meaning of the Greek word agapē. There is certainly something special about the Christian understanding of love for God, neighbor, and world as expressed in the NT. But this is not bound up with the meaning of a particular Greek word. The author who composed in Greek was in approximately the same situation as the English interpreter in having several words for “love” that overlapped in meaning. In Greek as in English there was and is no single Greek word with an inherent meaning that refers exclusively to the kind of love with which God loves the world and with which Christians are commanded to love God, each other, and their neighbors. Let it clearly be said: agapē was not such a word. Neither Jesus nor Christians invented this word, found in the LXX in a variety of senses: for the love of God (Deut 6:5) and neighbor (Lev 19:18) as here, but also of adulterous lust (e.g., Jer 2:25, 33), and of the love of money (Eccl 5:9). It is used as a synonym for ἐπιθυμία (epithymia) in Wisdom of Solomon 6, and for φιλία (philia) in 7:14; 8:2. The NT takes over this variety of usage of agapē. It is used in 2 Pet 2:15 for Balaam’s love for money. In Luke 6:32 it is used for sinners’ love for each other. In John 3:19 it is used for the love of evil people for the darkness. In addition, both agapē (noun) and agapaō (verb) are used as synonyms for φιλέω (phileō) / φιλία (philia), as in the celebrated but misunderstood John 21:15–17. Likewise, phileō, supposed in the traditional interpretation to express mutual love as in friendship, inferior to the self-giving love of agapē, is in fact used both for the deepest self-sacrificing love of both human beings and God (Matt 10:37; John 5:20; 11:3, 36; 16:27; 20:2; 1 Cor 16:22; Titus 3:15; Rev 3:19). When Christians use the word love with reference to God, to the deepest human relationships, and of the stance they are called to exercise toward the world, the content of this word is not to be filled in from the supposed meaning of a special Greek word, but from the understanding of God’s nature made known in Christ. It is from this revelatory perspective that we come to know love as unmotivated and unmanipulated, unconditional and unlimited. Such love is not a matter of feeling, which cannot be commanded in any case, but of commitment and action. It is at the farthest pole from sentimentality and is related to the OT word for “covenant love” or “steadfast love” (חסד ḥesed).

This is not the only opinion on the meaning of the various Greek words as used in the NT, but it one of the only commentaries I have found that explores how the words are used in the OT (LXX). Later in this commentary, other views are presented.


Image credit: The Pharisees Question Jesus (Les pharisiens questionnent Jésus), James Tissot, 1886-1894, Brooklyn Museum, PD-US