Denizens of the Deep

Virginia Class Submarine

The role of naval vessels, aircraft, missiles, drones, and ground forces are likely more familiar to the average citizen than the role, use, and operation of submarines. While I enjoyed the Hunt for Red October, I wondered if the screen writers wanted the submarines to perform an Immelmann Loop or some other amazing maneuver from the world of aerobatics. If jet aircraft are the Lamborghinis, submarines are the Dodge Ramblers of the order of battle. Your options are left, right, up, down, forward, and occasionally reverse. And doing all this blindfolded. Sound, sound detection, and silence are critical success factors. 

The U.S. submarine fleet is all nuclear powered which gives each submarine the ability to operate for extended periods of time during which fuel/fuel oil is not the limiting factor for operations. There are 14 Ohio Class ballistic missile boats (submarines are referred to as boats, not ships); 4 Ohio class boats were converted to Tomahawk cruise missiles. Each boat is capable of carrying up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles. The fast-attack (SSN) fleet consists of 28 older Los Angeles class boats, 25 newer Virginia class boats, and 3 from the Seawolf class. The Virginia and Seawolf boats are similar in capabilities. If you are interested in submarines and their operations in the 21st century, take a moment to watch this video on the Virginia Class submarine.

Virginia Class Submarines. The PRC’s China Maritime Studies Institute released their assessment of the Virginia Class submarine and its capabilities and threats. The title of the assessment was: The Elusive “Deep-Sea Beast”: Analysis of the Performance of the Main Equipment of the U.S. Navy Virginia-Class Nuclear Attack Submarine. The Virgnia Class has their attention because these boats are designed for classic submarine offensive operations, but also anti-submarine missions, special forces operations, intelligence gathering, surveillance and reconnaissance missions, and more.

The boat has advanced active and passive sonar systems, internal and external design features which are next generation noise suppression including the propulsion system which no longer utilizes the traditional massive propeller. All of these advanced systems are supported by advanced real-time processing solutions integrated into their specific mission. There are more than 400 sensors targeting internal ship noise and vibration that compromise the overall noise profile emanating from the boat – the profile that could be detected by other submerged units.  The suite of active and passive sonar is greatly enhanced with acoustic signal processing to identify underwater sounds from biologics to marine life to other underwater vehicles – manned or unmanned.

What does all of that mean? The Virginia class boats are capable of operations in the South China Sea if needed.

Sea Mines

Because of the current situation in the Straits of Hormuz, the general public is aware that sea mines remain a potent threat in denial of access operations. China might be expected to mine lanes of expected naval operation, waters around contested shoals and islands, and similar operations. China has no shortage of vessels from which to seed the waters. The U.S.’s most stealth means of laying mines is the submarine force. The US retains the capability to lay mines from surface vessels and aircraft. During WW II, the extensive mining of Japanese straits, ports, and waterways was accomplished by low flying B-29 bombers. It should be noted surface and air mine laying operations assume domination of the attending air space.

Denial of access operations would be a way for China to keep foreign vessels out. But at the same time, it is a way for other nations to keep China “in” and deny the flow of merchant shipping which is the life blood of the Chinese economy. Such an action is probably a last step before the outbreak of hostilities.  When the U.S. and allies embargoed oil shipments to Japan, it was the first domino to fall leading to Pearl Harbor. 

A modern sea mine is a self-contained explosive device designed to destroy ships, submarines and other types of vessels. Mines deny enemy ships and submarines access to specific ocean areas or channelize the enemy into operating in certain particular areas. As such, mines provide low-cost battlespace shaping and force protection capabilities for the U.S. Navy. And you do not have to bump into one in order to detonate the mine. Mines can operate on proximity triggers (magnetic, acoustic, pressure and vibrational) that are supported by microprocessors, e.g. to listen for the distinct and specific sound of a vessel’s propulsion, and machinery through the water. 

U.S. submarines are capable of laying specialized autonomous naval mines. The Mark 67 SLMM is a covert, submarine-launched mobile mine designed for shallow waters, while the Mark 60 CAPTOR encapsulates a torpedo. The Mark 60 waits on the ocean floor and uses its processing circuits to detect enemy submarines. Rather than exploding, the mine launches the torpedo. There are other mines in the inventory, but they operate similarly.

Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs)

But the truly next-level capability is with unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs). The extent of which these are currently deployed and their planned future – e.g., the DARPA Manta Ray Project – are the subject of next level undersea warfare. The UUVs will extend the base submarine’s sonar and weapons suite to areas either inaccessible (depth, danger, or incident avoidance, etc.) or prudently avoided. From the base submarine, there is a complete integration of sensor and communication systems, target motion analysis, tactical situational awareness, command and control decision tools, and launch control of all submarine payloads, including torpedoes, missiles, unmanned vehicles, and countermeasures.

I suspect it is the future of SCS operations.

Memorial of St. Boniface

Today is the Feast of St. Boniface, the Benedictine monk noted for his missionary efforts in the Netherlands (Frisia) and Germania in the 8th century.  Born in or near Exeter, England, around 675 AD,  and named Winfrid, he was of a respected and prosperous family. Against his father’s wishes he devoted himself at an early age to monastic life. He received further theological training in the Benedictine monastery near Winchester. As a monk, he taught in the abbey school until the age of 30 when he was ordained. It was expected that he would become the next abbot, but upon the death of his abbot, Boniface declined and instead volunteered for a mission to the people of Frisia. The first year was a bust, complicated by ongoing warfare. Continue reading

Eucharistic Life

This coming Sunday is the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ.  Where the principal focus of the previous section is the bread of life as the divine revelation given to men by and in Jesus, Jn 6:51 moves the focus to a clearly Eucharistic theme – ‘I am the living bread come down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.‘  While some argue the words are metaphor, the Jews clearly understand.  Jesus is referring to eating of his flesh. 

He recounts this action verb several other times between vv. 51-58, while adding the drinking of his blood to the command.  This is no metaphor for accepting his revelation, already adequately expressed.  “To eat someone’s flesh” appears in the Bible as a metaphor for hostile action (Ps 27:2, Zech 11:9).  In fact, in the Aramaic tradition, the “eater of flesh” is the title of the devil.  The drinking of blood was looked upon as a horrendous thing forbidden by God’s Law (Gen 9:4, Lev 3:17, Dt 12:23, and Acts 15:20).  Its symbolic meaning was that of brutal slaughter (Jer 45:10).  In Ezekiel’s vision of apocalyptic carnage (Ez 39:17), he invites the scavenging birds to come to the feast: ‘You shall have flesh to eat and blood to drink.’  Thus if Jesus’ words in v.53 (Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.) are to have positive, favorable meaning, they refer to the Eucharist.

In v.51, we have a parallel with v.35, which is the beginning of the revelation form of the Bread of Life Discourse, except that in v.51 Jesus speaks of the “living bread”, a term more suitable for the Eucharist.  In this same verse we see the connection of the living bread-the flesh-come down from heaven.  Recalling Jn 1:14 where the entrance of the Word among us was spoken of in terms of becoming flesh; and it is this same flesh that is to be given to man as living bread.  In the same passage John invokes the Incarnation and then closes with the death of Jesus, a Eucharistic theme.  Where in v.32 it is the Father who gives the heavenly bread (revelation), in v.51 where the bread becomes identified with the flesh of Jesus, he must give it himself.  Jesus must lay down his life of his own accord and that voluntary death makes Eucharistic participation in his flesh possible.  At the beginning of the Gospel we hear that Jesus is the Lamb of God who takes away the world’s sins (Jn 1:29); now in context of a discourse set at Passover time we hear that Jesus becomes the Paschal lamb and gives his flesh for the life of the world.

In v.52 we see a misunderstanding that parallels vv. 41-42.  Strangely, Jesus does not take any pains to explain away the Jewish repugnance at the cannibalistic thought of eating his flesh; rather in v.53 he emphasizes the reality of “feeding” on his flesh and adds the even more repugnant note of drinking his blood.  Versus 55-56 promises the gift of life to one who feeds on this Eucharist, but the Eucharistic promise follows the main body of the Discourse (vv 35-50) which insists on the necessity of belief in Jesus.  The juxtaposition of the two forms of the discourse teaches that the gift of life comes through belief in Jesus.  The Eucharistic life-giving is not through the “feeding”. Jn 6:57 says ‘..the one who feeds on me will have life because of me [Jesus]’.

The two themes of the Discourse, faith and Eucharist, cannot be separated for neither faith nor the Eucharist are directly the focus of attention, but rather both are unified in the person of Jesus who offers a living relationship through faith and Eucharist.  The sacramental experience does not replace faith in Jesus, but expresses and confirms it.  For John Eucharistic faith is to believe that the same, risen, Incarnate Jesus continues to give himself to believers in a personal communion and to exercise his life-giving mission.  Whoever participates in the exercise of faith and Eucharist ‘remains in me and I in him’.

While the synoptic gospel writers record the institution of the Eucharist, the theological gospel writer is the one who explains what the Eucharist does for the Christian – the personal communion with Jesus and thus with the Father.