The Lateran Basilica

In 2025, instead of the 32nd Sunday of Ordinary Time, this coming Sunday we celebrate the Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome. 

The Lateran Basilica in Rome is not the oldest church in Rome – that honor seems to belong to Santi Quattro Coronati (314); but then that depends on what sources you believe. Old St. Peter’s, the original church on the spot where the current St. Peter’s stands dates to 324, the same year as St. Lorenzo and St. John Lateran. Did you know that the Lateran Basilica is the Cathedral of the Diocese of Rome – the place from where the Bishop of Rome, Pope Leo, leads his diocese even as he leads the church universal.

The Lateran did not even start out as a church – it was a palace on the Lateran Hill that came into the possession of the Emperor Constantine who lifted the ban on Christianity in 313. Sometime later the emperor gifted it to the church and by 324 it was converted to become a church and was declared to be the “mother church” of all Christianity: ecclesia omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput – of all the churches in the city and the world, the mother and head.

Continue reading

A Parable of Right Relationships

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. 

The Pharisee’s prayer is filled with himself. He speaks of his virtues, compares himself to others, and essentially reminds God how good he is. He asks for nothing, because he believes he needs nothing. His prayer is not really prayer—it is self-congratulation before heaven.

The tax collector, on the other hand, has no illusions. He stands at a distance, cannot lift his eyes, and prays only, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” He knows the truth about himself, and he places his whole hope in God’s mercy. And Jesus tells us it is this man, not the Pharisee, who goes home justified.

This tells us something about true prayer:

Continue reading

A Parable of Reversal?

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. The parable reaches a conclusion as we are told: “I tell you, the latter [tax collector] went home justified.” The verb tense makes it clear that it is God who has justified this person. What does justified (dikaioo) mean? Lowe & Nida give the following for dikaioo:

  1. to cause someone to be in a proper or right relation with someone else
  2. to demonstrate that something is morally right
  3. the act of clearing someone of transgression
  4. to cause to be released from the control of some state or situation involving moral issues

It seems that 1 and 3 best fit the context. The tax collector goes home in a right relationship with God, because God made the relationship right. It was not something the tax collected did for himself (self-justification). The word also implies that he went home having been freed (by God) of his sin or guilt. He came to the temple “a sinner” and went home forgiven.

Continue reading

The Tax Collector

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. As with Jesus’ parables, especially in Luke, they often echo earlier passages. For example:

“I have not come to call the righteous to repentance but sinners.” (Luke 5:32)

…there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who have no need of repentance.” (Luke 15:7)

Those echoes ring clearly in the word of the tax collector’s prayer: ‘O God, be merciful to me a sinner.” (Luke 18:13)  

Four aspects of the tax-collectors humility are briefly indicated by Luke: (1) he stood far off, (2) he kept his eyes lowered, (3) he beat his beast as a sign of repentance, an (4) he cries out for mercy. Unlike the Pharisee, the tax collector gives at least some evidence of humility and contrition: “…would not even raise his eyes to heaven” The tax collector’s reticence echoes Ezra’s prayer upon hearing of the numerous mixed marriages in Jerusalem: “O my God, I am too ashamed and embarrassed to lift my face to you, my God, for our iniquities have risen higher than our heads, and our guilt has mounted up to the heavens” (Ezra 9:6). Both of the situational comments in 18:13a—the downward gaze and the breast-beating—speak of a deep sense of unworthiness and embarrassment. 

Continue reading

The Righteous Who Despise

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. In the previous post we considered the meaning of “righteous” as a prelude to the parable’s beginning: He then addressed this parable to those who were convinced of their own righteousness and despised everyone else. The Greek pepothoitas normally means “to convince” or “to persuade;” however, it can also mean “to seduce,” “to corrupt.” It would have been interesting had the translators chosen “those who seduced themselves that they were in right relationship to God.”

Continue reading

What is right

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. We hear this parable differently than the first century listener.  We know how the parable ends and we also know how Luke has been describing the Pharisees, thus even at the words one was a Pharisee we know how this will end. Won’t it be that the Pharisee will represent the one who trusts himself and his own righteousness rather than God and the one who judges others and holds them in contempt? But let’s consider how the first century listener might have heard this narrative.

Continue reading

Persistence, Presumption, and Promise

This coming Sunday the gospel is the parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector. This gospel follows the parable of the persistent widow and the unjust judge (18:1-8).  While the common thread is certainly prayer, there are other aspects which bind together these two narratives. One of Luke’s ongoing themes is the inclusivity of the Gospel. In these two parables, prayers are answered by God for a (saintly and probably poor) widow and the sinful (and probably rich) male tax collector. Luke continues to demonstrate that the Reign of God is open to all – a message of keen importance to his Gentile audience.

The two parables are well placed. Alan Culpepper (Luke, 340) notes that “By reading these two parables together, the reader is instructed to pray with the determination of the widow and the humility of the tax collector. Peter Rhea Jones has characterized the complementary themes of the two parables as ‘The promise of persistent prayer’ (18:1-8) and ‘The peril of presumptuous prayer’ (vv. 9-14).”  Each parable is instructive for the disciples of all ages about the nature of Christian prayer.

Continue reading

Ancient and Modern Thoughts

Every so often it is good to “check in” with the Patriarchs of the early Church to see their reflections on the parable of the Rich Man and Poor Lazarus.  Here is a sample of their thought

St. John Chrysostom (late 4th century AD) – often used this parable to warn that failing to aid the poor is itself a form of robbery. “Not to share our own wealth with the poor is theft from the poor and deprivation of their means of life; we do not possess our own wealth, but theirs.” (Homily on Lazarus and the Rich Man,  1) Chrysostom He stresses that the rich man’s sin was not that he had wealth, but that wealth without mercy leads to condemnation

St. Augustine (late 4th and early 5th century AD) focused on the end of the parable: “They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them.” (Luke 16:29). In his Sermon 115, Augustine warns that waiting for miraculous signs is foolish when the Word of God is already sufficient: “If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they believe if one rises from the dead.” (v. 31). For Augustine the matter that has always plagued humankind in our relationship to God is hardness of heart. The hardness of heart we display for those around has its own measure in the hardness of our hearts to follow the Word of God.

Continue reading

Act Three continued

This coming Sunday we continue in the Gospel of Luke with Jesus’ parable of the Rich Man and Poor Lazarus. We are describing the parable as a drama told in three acts. We are in midst of Act 3.

 The Second Exchange. 27 He said, ‘Then I beg you, father, send him to my father’s house, 28 for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they too come to this place of torment.’ 29 But Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them.’”

Here the rich man asks that Lazarus (again as servant) be sent back to warn the rich man’s surviving brothers. Seemingly accepting his fate, he at least gives evidence of thinking of another person. “But Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them’” (v.29). Indeed, let us listen to them:

If one of your kinsmen in any community is in need in the land which the LORD, your God, is giving you, you shall not harden your heart nor close your hand to him in his need. Instead, you shall open your hand to him and freely lend him enough to meet his need” (Dt 15:7-8)

Continue reading

Act 3 – Three Dialogues

This coming Sunday we continue in the Gospel of Luke with Jesus’ parable of the Rich Man and Poor Lazarus. We are describing the parable as a drama told in three acts. This is Act 3. To a first century hearer of the parable, the fates of the two would have been surprising for it went against the grain of the common wisdom: blessings in this life were a sign of God’s favor while illness, poverty, and hardship were a sign of God’s curses. Yet the one well “blessed” in his lifetime is now tormented in the netherworld (see the Note on 16:23 below) where he can see Lazarus and Abraham across the great chasm that divides them (v.26).

The First Exchange. 24 And he cried out, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.’ 25 Abraham replied, ‘My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented. 26 Moreover, between us and you a great chasm is established to prevent anyone from crossing who might wish to go from our side to yours or from your side to ours.’

Continue reading